| STYLES: STANDARD | PRINT | NAVIGATE: ⇩ CRITICALLYTOUCHED.COM |
|
| home | reviews | articles | links | discussion |

| - | Quick Links |
| - | Introduction |
Welcome to the Hellmouth, everyone! Analyzing Season 1 of Buffy the Vampire Slayer is an interesting endeavor for me. It's obvious that the show Buffy becomes later on very much evolved out of the trial and error that was persistent throughout this inaugural season. While this fact does allow me to give the season a bit of leeway, I certainly can't ignore its mistakes. Season 1 certainly has its innocence and charm, even more so in retrospect, but it's also unmistakably flawed when taken as a whole. Even the most flawed seasons to come (i.e. 4 and 7) had incredible strengths that helped balance out their flaws. Season 1 has no such level of strengths and even more severe flaws, which is why it is without any doubt the weakest season of them all.

The basic underlying theme of the show, at least in its early years, revolves around the phrase "high school is hell." This is a good starting point, but how successful this theme is depends entirely on how it's presented to us. Where Season 2 and Season 3 largely let this theme percolate in the background, informing but not taking over the stories, Season 1 gives it the spotlight in what manifests in a large number of monster-of-the-week metaphor episodes. Although I might initially be inclined to scoff at the notion of too many stand-alone episodes in favor of a serialized narrative, it's not the stand-alone nature that proves to be the problem here – at least not directly. The underlying issue, in actuality, is the lack of serialized character development. Because of this many of the individual stories and their respective metaphors don't run very deep and end up lacking that all-important resonance.
Despite the numerous issues plaguing this season -- its cheesiness and shoddy production values not helping – there are still several things to applaud. As previously mentioned the season, especially in retrospect, has a certain innocence and charm about it. The characters truly are children at this point with only the seeds of future character strengths and flaws present, and there's a certain sense of glee in seeing these characters completely free of the burdens they will come to bear in the future. This contrast is one of the reasons why the material to come is so powerful. Important to note is that the show doesn't leave these "seeds" entirely untouched here in Season 1. It does actually touch on them at various points in the season with Buffy, in particular, getting some noteworthy growth of her own.

Some of the staples of the whole show are present right from the beginning. This includes episodes that utilize underlying themes to service the story and, occasionally in Season 1, the characters as well. Also included is the show's extremely fresh and clever use of language; the dialogue on Buffy is one of its biggest strengths right from the get-go, although like everything else it gets even better later. The acting from most of the main players is fairly strong right from the start, particularly with Sarah Michelle Gellar getting the opportunity to show her stuff on several occasions and, most prominently, in all of "Prophecy Girl" [1x12].
I've noticed that some fans like to give Season 1 a 'free pass' in evaluating it. I don't feel this is a wise maneuver, as it dilutes the comparative analysis of the seasons to come, but I can certainly understand where the sentiment comes from. The season has its temperate ups and its frigid downs, but one thing I can safely say about it is that it's a lightweight, fun, and often charming group of episodes nonetheless. Season 1 leaves us with a show that is not yet fully formed and hasn't completely figured out what it's capable of yet, but I can't say that it doesn't have its heart in the right place.
| - | Overview |
Season 1 begins in solid fashion with a quality series opener: "Welcome to the Hellmouth" [1x01]. Buffy Summers arrives in Sunnydale, CA with her mother looking for a fresh beginning. Buffy's recent brush with vampire slaying and expulsion have irrevocably changed her life in ways she both didn't want and didn't expect.

Unfortunately for her, though, Sunnydale isn't quite what it appears to be on the surface and instead of a fresh start, Buffy soon finds out that she now stands at the mouth of Hell. Not all is doom and gloom, however, as Buffy's arrival at Sunnydale High School leads her to make a few brand new friends in Willow and Xander all while trying to push away the British librarian Rupert Giles from lecturing her about destiny. In these opening couple episodes we're also introduced to the villain of the season: the Master, an ancient vampire trying to rise from his Christian tomb beneath the high school.
"The Witch" [1x03] and "Teacher's Pet" [1x04] give us a couple stand-alone episodes that further broaden the scope of the series' mythology and, in the case of the latter, show us just how bad the show can be at its worst (a problem thankfully almost entirely limited to Season 1). "Never Kill a Boy on the First Date" [1x05], on the other hand, gives us a front and center look at Buffy for the first time since the pilot, providing a worthwhile initial exploration of Buffy's double life.
"The Pack" [1x06] is largely a one-off misfire while "Angel" [1x07] takes the time to give the mysterious Angel some background which, coincidentally, is what really sets off the relationship between him and Buffy. Things go right back to the monster-of-the-week mold for the rest of the season. These episodes range from comically poor ("I Robot, You Jane" [1x08]) to pointless ("The Puppet Show" [1x09]) to revealing ("Out of Mind, Out of Sight" [1x11]). The season then wraps up on a high note thanks to "Prophecy Girl" [1x12], an episode that has some real poignancy and leaves the Master defeated at Buffy's hands.
| - | Cons |

Season 1 of Buffy the Vampire Slayer is not a great season of television, but it's not exactly terrible either. It has its strengths, but the flaws are too dominant to ignore. This is easily the weakest season of the show and represents its most unformed stage. The biggest single factor truly dragging the season down is the lack of character relevance in the numerous stand-alone episodes. Whereas later seasons used its stories as a springboard for serialized character development, the stories here are just that: isolated stories that offer little to the whole of the show.
Episodes of television that are separate from the primary narrative can still offer what I crave: intelligent character development and/or insight. A great example I like to use to illustrate this point is the Season 5 episode "I Was Made to Love You" [5x15]. This is unquestionably a stand-alone in that it has absolutely no direct connection to the season's narrative surrounding Glory and Dawn. Yet this episode still manages to provide substantial growth and insight for Buffy and drives her character arc in the season, and series, forward. Television at its best, in this reviewer's opinion, is that which has at least some serialized narrative elements but, much more importantly, has consistent serialized character development.

Season 1 is relatively lacking in this regard, although it does have its moments nonetheless. Putting aside character development for a moment, there is also a stark difference between a quality isolated stand-alone episode and a poor one. In Season 1's case, just look to the differences between "The Witch" [1x03], "I Robot, You Jane" [1x08], and "The Puppet Show" [1x09]. The first of these gives us a modestly clever story with a relatable metaphor that largely works within the confines of itself. The second of these has something it's trying to say, but completely fails at delivering it in convincing fashion. The last of these has next to nothing to say at all – it doesn't even really try. In all three of these examples there is almost non-existent character development, yet they are all still of vastly varying quality.
Many Season 1 episodes are not only lacking in basic character relevance, but also in basic quality, which obviously hurts the overall quality of the season significantly. The plot running through the season involving the Master doesn't help much either. Both the Master himself and the story surrounding him are underdeveloped and, at times, borderline goofy. Where in all subsequent seasons the villains play a pivotal thematic role in how the characters develop that year, the Master only has a dash of that relevance and it's fairly confined to Buffy.

The final thing bringing the season down is its very poor production values and occasional overload of cheesiness. This includes the musical score, sound effects, special effects, and overall film quality. I get the impression that Whedon was trying to play off of common horror tropes, but he occasionally failed to find the right mixture for it to work as intended.
While Season 1 is glittered with problems, it's clear that they are all put to good use in the evolution of the show. Season 2, right from the beginning, shows an improvement in several of the areas that were lacking in Season 1. By the time "Innocence" [2x14] rolls around, we're looking at a completely different level of show, albeit one that was still built out of the successes and failures of before. Watching Season 1 in retrospect is like a fun little experiment that you know is going to pay off in the end.
| - | Pros |
When I watched Buffy for the first time the very first thing that jumped out at me was how delightful the tone of the show was when it stayed away from getting a bit too goofy. Both the characters and the show had a wonderful sense of charm and innocence about them. The characters all had their heart in the right place but also had varying degrees of flaws just ripe for exploration and development.

Watching Season 1 multiple times doesn't lose this feeling. In fact, it enhances it! Knowing the wonders and tragedies on the horizon makes me treasure how relatively simple this season is. Conversely, this season's innocence is what makes said wonders and tragedies so wondrous and tragic. It's the circle of life, and the mark of a truly well-constructed show.
What, specifically, is this "charm" and "innocence" I'm talking about? Good question! These attributes are manifested in several different ways. One of these ways is how Whedon outlined all the central characters as being very likeable, well-intentioned kids. This is a great way to help viewers get on board yet still be able to enjoy the ride into the complexity, confusion, and tragedy that follows. Another way is in how the characters interact with each other, which includes Whedon's gift for linguistics. The dialogue on the show, although not fully refined from the very start, is witty, snappy, clever, and quite fun to listen to. Having otherwise uninteresting conversations transformed into a delicacy for the ears is quite the treat, and something I rarely get to experience to this day in television and film. It's a pleasure simply listening to the characters talk to each other.
How dialogue transforms this show into something completely unique is not to be understated, especially considering it only gets more refined in the seasons to come. As much as I love the overall tone and speech from the start, though, it still wouldn't take the show very far on its own. While Season 1 is certainly lacking in character development it does get a few things right, with the exploration of Buffy's duty and double life being at the top of that list.

I'll go into more detail about this in the character analysis below, but Season 1 actually gives Buffy a well-realized story. This not only informs and enriches what's to come, but is also nicely self-contained. From Buffy's reluctance with her duty in the premiere to the difficulties in trying to live a double life in "Never Kill a Boy on the First Date" [1x05] to the insight she learns about others in "The Witch" [1x03], "Angel" [1x07], and "Out of Mind, Out of Sight" [1x11] to the crushing reality of the type of sacrifices demanded of her in "Prophecy Girl" [1x12], the season is surprisingly solid in establishing Buffy as a unique three-dimensional character with complex strengths and flaws. I can only applaud the season for accomplishing this – it's the season's backbone.
While Buffy was easily the only character to get substantial recurring development, some others got at least a little bit of attention as well. More of Xander's flaws than his strengths were brought to light. Willow's insecurity and intense curiosity are touched on. Giles' approach to the mission, and to Buffy, is evolved, Angel's given a bit of depth, and, although it took ages, Cordelia actually becomes something other than a walking caricature. I wouldn't call all of that remotely adequate for what I'm looking for in a season of television, but I do appreciate what's there nonetheless.
Season 1 may be lacking the brilliant episodes and complex character development we will come to expect from the show, but it's got just enough charm, just enough innocence, just enough wittiness, and just enough Buffy to give us a fun and worthwhile experience.
| - | Buffy |

I will say it right here and get it out of the way: Buffy is my favorite fictional character in any medium. In my many years discussing television with other people, I often get asked why. Even within the confines of Buffy the show, the character is rarely anywhere near the top of peoples' favorites list. I often hear that people find her extremely selfish, which is a complaint that confounds me. First of all, Buffy starts out the show a teenager, and teenagers are notoriously into themselves – Buffy is no exception at times. Secondly, she's got this ever present burden of oh, I don't know, saving peoples' lives; a burden and power that was initially forced onto her and one that she can't quite turn away from, because she realizes that she can actually help people with it and make a difference in the world. Frankly, if Buffy wasn't a bit self-centered every now and then I would have a hard time seeing her as a realistic character! I love Buffy because she's not Kendra and not Faith. Buffy is one of us.
Season 1 actually does a surprisingly solid job of establishing Buffy as a likeable, realistic, and complex character – all traits which are developed and explored significantly as the series progresses. There's the backstory involving discovering her slayer-hood and how that tore apart her old life – and she worries, in part, her parents' marriage -- in Los Angeles. There are also concerns about how much her dad really cares about her – concerns which turn out to be incredibly well-founded. These fears, some of which were brought to life in "Nightmares" [1x10], go far beyond superficial characterization. Rather, they significantly color many of Buffy's decisions and feelings throughout the entire series, particularly in regard to her relationships. Buffy's story can be generically described as a coming-of-age story. The problem with that description, though, is how much it short-changes the specific issues and complexities present within it. There's nothing generic at all about Buffy Summers.

The history that Buffy brings with her from Los Angeles isn't the only kind of history that plagues her either. Very early on it's established that Buffy doesn't have a cozy relationship with the subject of history either, which definitely comes along with some subtext. In "Angel" [1x07], Giles tells Joyce that Buffy lives "very much in the 'now.'" This response is as metaphorical as it is literal, and can be construed as both a positive and a negative.
Buffy often uses her modern sensibilities to her advantage, such as when she is able to detect a vampire at the Bronze in "Welcome to the Hellmouth" [1x01] by using her fashion sensibilities rather than the traditional slayer ability to, as Giles puts it, "hone" her senses. Buffy's subversion of traditional sensibilities is often to her benefit, but it's wise to learn from the traditions that made sense too. This is why, as the series progresses, Buffy not only uses her modern instincts but also utilizes her slayer abilities to their fullest, in no small part thanks to Giles' training and assistance. History is an important part of the character, as much as Buffy would hate to admit it, and I appreciate that Season 1 dips its toes into the subject.

One of the more noticeable recurring elements in Season 1 is Buffy's growing romantic involvement with Angel. This relationship completely exposes Buffy's romantic naiveté and innocence, which are both traits that one can hardly fault her for at sixteen years old. While her infatuation and raw excitement over the mysterious and brooding Angel are entirely normal, these feelings don't necessarily lead to good decision-making; it takes a clear mind and a strong will to recognize this. It's great that Buffy gives Angel a chance after finding out he's a vampire with a soul, but he's much older than her and there's a whole lot she doesn't know about him. Despite these warning signs Buffy pushes onward with her romantic involvement with him, which is certainly fun for her, and us to see, while it lasts. All of this danger and emotion swirling around is handled with a pretty decent amount of subtlety and is a slowly building endeavor in Season 1, much to its credit. It will all come to a head in Season 2, of course, which will really pay off all this nice build-up.
Buffy's escalating romance with Angel is in the background of a lot of episodes, but what has even more weight within the season are the core themes surrounding her development: that of responsibility and sacrifice. The Buffy/Giles library scene in "Welcome to the Hellmouth" [1x01] sets the tone for Buffy's struggles right off the bat. She tells him, "Prepares me for what? For getting kicked out of school? For losing all of my friends? For having to spend all of my time fighting for my life and never getting to tell anyone because I might endanger them? Go ahead! Prepare me!"

When you boil it down, all Buffy wants is what any good kid subconsciously wants: happy, caring, understanding, and together parents, and just enough freedom to explore and enjoy adolescence, within healthy limits. Between this fairly new slayer responsibility forced on Buffy and the dissolution of her parents' marriage, Buffy arrives in Sunnydale wanting a fresh start only to be stuck with the return of all her old problems, amplified. Giles directly reminds her of the responsibilities expected of her, but as the season progresses Buffy comes to recognize all on her own why she is responsible and what that really means for both her and those people around her. In "Never Kill a Boy on the First Date" [1x05] Buffy goes out with what turns out to be "danger guy" (Owen) who, in Buffy's world, would meet a quick gruesome death if he continued to tag along. While she's out on a date with him Giles almost gets isolated by a group of vampires. Buffy comes to recognize that saving lives and helping others is something she has the power to do, and isn't something she can easily turn away from just because she wants to live a normal happy life.
As "Prophecy Girl" [1x12] clearly highlights, sacrifice is not fun and is not something we're initially inclined to volunteer for, but to not do what one can to help is to let evil surround the world around you without a fight and eventually consume not only you, but also all those who you hold dear. When Buffy learns she's prophesized to die, her reaction is nothing but entirely human. As I stated in my review of "Prophecy Girl" [1x12], "After talking with her mom and learning about how vampires are encroaching further onto school grounds from a scared Willow, she [Buffy] accepts the purpose her role serves in this world, even if she doesn't like it. With only an adamant and noble Giles, who understands the stakes as well, in the way, Buffy punches him out and picks up her cross, thereby signifying her acceptance of what that symbol means."

It's at this moment when Buffy takes the very first step in accepting a kind of ownership of this massive burden. Buffy chooses to fight not because she has to, but because she knows it's the right thing to do. Personally, I quite admire her courage and conviction in the face of her struggles and flaws, and strive to work towards the same. When Buffy goes to face the Master, all the basic elements that define her are symbolized: her strength in the leather jacket and the crossbow, her innocence (both sexually and otherwise) in the white dress, and her courage, selflessness, and sacrificial burden in the cross.
Much appreciation has to go out to Sarah Michelle Gellar for knocking this role out of the park from episode one. Gellar performs Buffy in a way that is dynamic and extremely palpable, ranging from her inner struggles to her nascent sexuality to her emotional lows to her ability in bringing Whedon's language to life to her comedic timing to her occasional bursts of unbridled excitement. Extremely emotive facial expressions seem to be one of her specialties, and it does wonders for this role. I can't say enough how perfect she is as Buffy, as it's always a pleasure watching her do her thing. The few people out there who call her a poor performer have a very foreign sense of acting ability from what I know.
Buffy's Season 1 arc isn't particularly emphasized throughout the season, but there are a handful of episodes that almost completely make up for it and add up to a cohesive whole. Buffy heads into Season 2 a different person than when she arrived in Sunnydale in "Welcome to the Hellmouth" [1x01]. Drowning at the hands of the Master in "Prophecy Girl" [1x12] leaves a psychological scar that haunts her all summer and is brought to the surface in the underrated Season 2 opener, "When She Was Bad" [2x01]. Buffy Summers is a vibrant and extremely complex character, and I feel that the brief Season 1 does a surprisingly solid job at establishing what she's all about.
| - | Willow |

It is clear that Joss Whedon had thought about Buffy's journey quite a bit coming into the series, as the character comes across solid right from the start. Willow, on the other hand, doesn't get a lot to do in Season 1 beyond being incredibly adorable. Alyson Hannigan milks the role for all it's worth and brings the character to life in a way that, I'm sad to say, the writing this season does not do justice. As the series progresses Willow becomes a complex character in her own right, but Season 1 only barely scratches the surface of what's going on inside her head.
From "Welcome to the Hellmouth" [1x01] we know right away that she's an intelligent girl who has far too little self-confidence, and is walked on by Cordelia and the like because of it. Deep down it's also clear that she has the desire to shed herself of this shy, introverted image – to actually become a different person than she is today rather than cultivate her best qualities and improve on her flaws. Willow has a very curious mind that occasionally leads her to explore things that are dangerous, exemplified in Season 1 by her encounter with the demon Moloch in "I Robot, You Jane" [1x08]. On the more positive side, though, she is shown to immediately want to help Buffy out and through the course of the season becomes more courageous for it.

Unfortunately the only real hint of Willow's struggles with power and control, and how they mask her inherent insecurities, show up in the form of her technology skills – her only real 'power' at this point – and how casually she is willing to do illegal things with those skills as long as it's for a good reason. It's nice that all of these seeds are cultivated in Season 2 and beyond, but I can't help but feel like so much more could have been done with Willow here in Season 1. It doesn't help that the only episode to give her the spotlight, "I Robot, You Jane" [1x08], is quite poor and partially allows Willow off the hook for her behavior due to a case of Demon's Thrall [TM].
Considering how much depth Buffy has from the start, it's just unfortunate Willow doesn't get more to do this season. I do enjoy the tantalizing little seeds that have been planted, and some of the initial bits of strength she shows (such as in "The Pack" [1x06] and in not being Xander's castoff date in "Prophecy Girl" [1x12]), but I wanted a lot more for Willow. Thankfully, Season 2 begins to get things rolling.
| - | Xander |

Xander, in the early seasons, is a character I love to dislike. He's the kind of guy that's fun to have around most of the time but harbors some deep-seated jealousies and selfishness. I think he's generally written pretty well and is fairly well-intentioned outside these issues, although unfortunately he occasionally gets consumed by them. Xander doesn't come to have nearly as much depth as characters like Buffy and Willow do as the series progresses, but he always remains an important part of the group. Season 1 actually gives him a tad more to work with that it does for Willow, which is actually kind of surprising. Right from the beginning he's established as a nerdy outcast of the school and, as Season 1 develops, we begin to see his crush on Buffy intensify and the jealous and selfish part of his nature begin to seep out as Buffy's romantic pursuits lie elsewhere.
This part of Xander' nature begins to become noticeable in "Never Kill a Boy on the First Date" [1x05] and comes up again in regard to just about anything surrounding Angel. This is all while Buffy makes it fairly obvious that she has no interest in him quite early on. A part of me wonders if Xander would even bother standing by Buffy in the fight against evil had he not been extremely attracted to her, which certainly doesn't speak well of his character. Nor does what we see of Xander's desires in "Teacher's Pet" [1x04], such as dreaming up Buffy as a weak and scared girl as a way for him to feel wanted and strong. This general selfishness defines many of his actions in the early seasons (the infamous "Becoming Pt. 2" [2x22] "kick his ass" line being a prime example), but it is also something the show, and Buffy (see "Revelations" [3x07]), fortunately don't push under the rug. Despite all this I still feel sorry for him when Buffy shuts him down after he asks her out in "Prophecy Girl" [1x12]. It's a rough moment for any young teen with a huge crush.

Xander gets decently defined in Season 1 but it's his most negative qualities that are underlined, for the most part. One aspect of Xander's better qualities that does shine this season is his sense of humor. The season relies on this aspect of his personality so that he can connect with both the viewer and the other characters. The humor – which is often quite amusing -- does a pretty good job at masking his underlying flaws, which is why he is generally a pleasant presence on the show. I can't help but feel how nice it would have been to have an episode focused on Xander that didn't have serious issues (I'm looking at you "Teacher's Pet" [1x04]).
Despite some of my personal issues with Xander, I genuinely appreciate how his personality is played against the other characters. I love what he brings to the dynamic of the show, and I can accredit Season 1 for doing a pretty good job at bringing that to the table. I want to also emphasize that he's not a terrible person or anything, just often transparently selfish in the high school years. The great part about this is how well these flaws will be used in the seasons to come. Xander becomes even more interesting and a much better person with growth and time. By the end of Season 3, I even start to like the guy a bit.
| - | Giles |

"I'm Mr. Giles. The librarian," says Giles in one of his very first lines in the series. Giles starts off a bit of a caricature of a stuffy old British guy, which doesn't make him particularly interesting out of the gate. It doesn't help that he serves as exposition guy in almost every episode. Fortunately, through his ever-growing fatherly bond with Buffy he begins to evolve out of this pattern by the end of the season and into an interesting character in his own right. Although I wish he was drawn with more depth from the start, I do appreciate the few gems he gets.
The journey Giles goes through is inexorably tied to Buffy, particularly in the high school years. This is why it is so important to make note of how the foundation of their relationship is built. "Never Kill a Boy on the First Date" [1x05] is really the first time Giles is able to seriously connect with Buffy, human-to-human. Giles' sympathy towards Buffy's struggles trying to balance her slayer responsibilities with her personal life is something he actually understands, despite how hard he was on her earlier in the episode. As he tells her, "I have volumes of lore, of prophecies, of predictions. But I don't have an instruction manual. We feel our way as we go along."
When it's revealed that Angel's a vampire and that Buffy has real feelings for him in "Angel" [1x07], we see that Giles is very level-headed and doesn't make any rash initial judgments (unlike a certain Xander) – he simply states the facts as he knows them. When he later learns about Angel's soul, Giles even calls their relationship "rather poetic, in a maudlin sort of way." While the bond between Buffy and Giles isn't what I'd call a big part of the season, the accumulation of what is there becomes strikingly clear in "Prophecy Girl" [1x12].

Giles is a wreck trying to figure a way out of the prophecy that Buffy is to die at the hands of the Master. When Buffy overhears him and lashes out, his anguish over his feeling of helplessness is palpable. Giles desperately wants to help Buffy and, later in the episode, attempts to do just that. Even after Buffy turns around and decides to accept her fate in an attempt to take out the Master with her, Giles pushes back saying, "Buffy, I'm not going to send you out there to die. Now, you were right. I've waded around in these old books for so long; I've forgotten what the real world is like. It's time I found out." It's to his credit that Buffy has to punch him out to prevent him from taking her place.
The effort by Giles in "Prophecy Girl" [1x12] only strengthens their bond – a bond which will be tested in various ways in the seasons ahead. Giles should have gotten more attention in Season 1, particularly in regard to his turbulent history (which we do get a hint of at the end of "Never Kill a Boy on the First Date" [1x05]), but I can't deny how charming he becomes by the end of it which is a nice turn-around from his stuffy introduction. It's no wonder Jenny Calendar shows immediate interest in him. The good news for Giles is that Season 2 has this season's deficiencies covered.
| - | Cordelia |

Cordelia was never one of the more complex characters on Buffy, but in time it became believable for her to say something like "[w]hat? I can't have layers?" ("Band Candy" [3x06]), and have it actually mean something. In Season 1, though, Cordelia's one-dimensionality is at an all-time high. Her presence is often entertaining but it's also incredibly superficial and unrewarding. If this was all there was to say about Cordelia this season, I'd be one sad cookie.
Fortunately for everyone involved, "Out of Mind, Out of Sight" [1x11] came along and made Cordelia someone to look more closely at. Through the story of a girl who has turned completely invisible, ever popular Cordelia reveals that she actually understands a bit of Marcie's loneliness, saying "I can be surrounded by people and be completely alone. It's not like any of them really know me. I don't even know if they like me half the time. People just want to be in a popular zone. Sometimes when I talk, everyone's so busy agreeing with me, they don't hear a word I say." Now, despite Cordelia having a nice moment of self-reflection, that certainly doesn't excuse how she often ridicules those who don't place the same priorities in life that she does.

Between being saved by Buffy from the crazy Marcie in "Out of Mind, Out of Sight" [1x11] and vampires slaughtering some kids on school ground in "Prophecy Girl" (her boyfriend among them), Cordelia begins to really wake up in terms of the danger that surrounds her and the importance of Buffy's work. This not only warms her up to Buffy a bit, but also Xander and Willow by proxy. Thankfully we don't see a complete turn-around on her attitude towards them or anything like that, but we do see her being fairer in the midst of her usual derision.
Season 1 gives Cordelia some good material towards the end of the season, but it ends up coming too late for me to fully applaud it. I would have liked to have seen more done, and have seen it a whole lot sooner. At least Season 1 is able to position Cordelia to be open to the concept of having interest in Xander when "Some Assembly Required" [2x02] comes around, which then leads to more substantial self-discovery and growth in Season 2.
| - | Angel |

Angel has the unfortunate fate of being relegated to Buffy's love interest in Season 1, and not a whole lot more. In the first several episodes he doesn't even have that going for him and serves only one purpose: being the mysterious-brooding-exposition guy. This purpose isn't even portrayed all that well due to some initially terrible acting from David Boreanaz. Thankfully his acting gradually improves throughout Season 1, and then gets tremendously better during Season 2.
The end of "Teacher's Pet" [1x04], what with the leather jacket transfer-of-love and all, gives Angel some additional intrigue by tacking on the seeds of romance with Buffy. It's not until "Angel" [1x07] when the guy gets a real backstory. Even here, though, most of this backstory is told in a fairly exposition-y manner. But the whole vampire-with-a-soul complication does add a nice layer to the character. As I pointed out in that review, "We can see that while Buffy's trying to balance slaying, school, and romance, Angel's juggling with his demonic nature, desire for amends, and becoming romantically invested in someone for likely the very first time in his soul-having existence. Right now the thing both Buffy and Angel have in common is their mutual attraction and newfound investment in each other."

A more subtle element I appreciated was the little connection Angel has with Giles towards the end of the season (see "Out of Mind, Out of Sight" [1x11]). They both have one striking thing in common – besides, of course, their desire to fight the forces of evil – and that is that both of their journeys as characters are strongly linked to Buffy for the next couple years. With Angel, though, it's a romantic link more than anything else. This connection between Angel and Giles is particularly awesome considering how it will be turned on its head when Angelus is unleashed on the world next season (see "Passion" [2x17]).
Overall I'm not too impressed with what Season 1 did for Angel. There's simply not a lot there beyond a basic backstory, some light romance, and some exposition. With that said, there's just enough of that romance and intrigue to help hold us over until things get much more interesting going forward.
| - | The Master |

The Master is a pretty mediocre villain, at best, and there's no real way around that. He has some nice moments, mostly in the form of comedy, but overall I found him to be pretty underwhelming and at times a tad overly goofy. The only times I found him remotely threatening was Buffy's living nightmare in, well, "Nightmares" [1x10], and in the mid parts of "Prophecy Girl" [1x12]. It certainly didn't help that the quality of his makeup was so inconsistent.
Despite being an underwritten character he does offer some thematic synergy with what the show's all about. From my review of "Welcome to the Hellmouth" [1x01]: "The Master and his followers – while fairly corny – very much represent the old way of things. This group of vampires – the Order of Aurelius -- is trying to instigate the return of the old ones. While they wait for their moment they live below ground and only go up to feed or make more of their kind. Buffy as a character and as a show are all about subverting the outdated and the old. This is why Buffy will defeat the Master in "Prophecy Girl" [1x12] and why Spike will gloriously scorch the Anointed One in "School Hard" [2x03] with a proclamation about less ritual and more fun." While it's nice that the Master serves a light thematic purpose and isn't just the token villain to be killed, his value certainly, and sadly, goes no further.
I haven't really talked about the Anointed One because, well, there's really nothing to talk about. He stands around a lot, learns about fear a bit, and leads Buffy down to the Master's lair. That's about it. This is why it's such a joy to hear him pissed off by Buffy thwarting his resurrection attempt (see "When She Was Bad" [2x01]) and to see him scorched by Spike (see "School Hard" [2x03]), all in early Season 2.
| - | Conclusion |

Season 1's central theme is the concept that high school is hell, literally. It has a whole bunch of completely stand-alone episodes that do very little for the characters. These episodes tell overall decent little stories, usually with a metaphor at the center of them, but many of them are not very subtle in their execution. The season also sports fairly awful effects, an abysmal musical score, and overall shoddy production values. While all of these flaws seem pretty damning, all is not lost!
The character work that is present largely focuses around Buffy, who ends up forming the foundation for the season to stand on and is the primary reason it resonates for me at all. The themes surrounding her – primarily responsibility, sacrifice, and innocence -- are all very consistently rendered into the tapestry of the show and will provide many returns as it moves forward. Buffy as a character also stands in for the show's wonderfully whimsical attitude towards subverting many old horror tropes.

Beyond the big stuff, there are also some intangibles that really help make viewing this season much more pleasurable than it otherwise would be. These include the inventive use of language, the largely loveable characters, and the show's wonderful sense of humor. The fact it utilizes all these positive traits with a healthy dose of tongue-in-cheek self-awareness certainly doesn't hurt. Even with all the flaws plaguing this season, it's still pretty fun to watch most of the time. It's just that Season 1 is a lot more care-free and consequence-free than all the seasons the come after it, which could be viewed as both a positive and a negative – I admittedly lean more towards the negative.
As for how the show fares going forward? Well, think about it this way: Season 2 alleviates a lot of Season 1's biggest problems. Some examples addressed will be the poor production values, the terrible music, the lack of character development, and the complete lack of any truly brilliant episodes. I think it's safe to say that Whedon learned from both what worked and what failed miserably in this inaugural season. Although Buffy the Vampire Slayer starts out a bit rough, it's still a lot of fun and doesn't really dilute the next six often brilliant seasons of what this humble reviewer can still easily say is the best television show he has ever seen.
| - | Season Breakdown | Learn about the Grading Scale |
|
|
|
| - | Average Episode Score |
| 67/100 |
C ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ |
A season with several problematic episodes and no brilliant episodes. Although many of them are flawed, there are enough minor standouts that begin to display what the show is capable of. |
| - | Season Score |
| 71/100 |
C+ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ |
An overall enjoyable season? Yes. A quality season? Not so much. However, the character work for Buffy holds the season together and provides a worthwhile addition to the tapestry of the series. |
| - | Awards |
|
|
|
| - | Screencaps |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| - |
Comments (51)
View Today's Comments |
Subscribe:
|
| 1. | AaronJerSep 14, 2006 (Thu)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| The only thing I really liked about Season 1 is the sharp contrast it has to the later seasons. It's all like, "Oh no! Vampires! *stab*", as compared to horrific emotional trauma later on. It makes the later seasons hit harder when you can remember that things used to be so fluffy and nice. |
| 2. | Dingdong(alistic)Sep 24, 2006 (Sun)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I wouldn't say it's as cut and dried as that. Season one is the lightest season, but the emotional trauma doesn't dominate either season three or four either. |
| 3. | 21Apr 21, 2007 (Sat)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Unless you consider things from Faith's point of view. |
| 4. | LibMaxJul 14, 2007 (Sat)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I think Season One was the weakest season of Buffy. There's plenty of good stuff, flashes of the brilliance that would characterize most of the rest of the series (with a few sputters in Season Two and significant sagging in Season Seven). But the performances, the dialog, and the directing are very hit-and-miss, with little apparent quality control. Most of the episode plots are inane and formulaic - introduce the monster, figure out how Buffy can kill the monster, oops it's dead. The effects are mostly awful, and the cheese factor is high in many episodes, especially "The Puppet Show." The Master was the weakest of all the Big Bads, fun only when he got out of his hole in the ground (mostly in "Nightmares") or when he was making fun of how boring he usually was ("Oh, wait, that isn't written anywhere."). Check him out in "The Wish" to see how much better the actor and the character can be once they drop the bell-book-and-candle stuff and give him a real point of view. And I guess I'll be the first to mention the worst recurring character/performance ever, The Annointed One. Everything that's good in Season One is stuff that got better in the subsequent seasons. The basic characters and character relationships are wonderful, and the character development was probably the single best feature of the season. That and the fact that, even in a supernatural genre with some pretty silly plotlines, actions always had consequences for the characters. |
| 5. | DingdongalisticJul 24, 2007 (Tue)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
And virtually all of season three. |
| 6. | buffyholicJul 25, 2007 (Wed)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I agree. Although I like S1 very much, it´s very weak, the weakest of Buffy. The thing that surprises the most is the character development. When we get to the later seasons, we stand in awe thinking that the characters came from S1, all happy and not so concerned with all the things they would experience later on. When we see the entire series, we even watch to see S1 as a reminder of those happy days. |
| 7. | entEngleNov 9, 2007 (Fri)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I'm loaning my Buffy dvds to a friend who's interest was spawned by Serenity & Firefly. He's aware of my obsession, and knows my emotions are invested in the anticipated sharing of all 144. That said, I spend much time at trying to find better introductions to Buffy than seas.1. At best, I feel it is like that deep relaxing breath, BEFORE something truly great. Since my friend WANTS to watch 1st things 1st, I'm conceding reluctantly and surrendering 1,2&3 of 39. |
| 8. | AndrewDec 29, 2007 (Sat)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Hm. The Master is frankly rubbish- I think you under-state the case there. I would agree that the only time he comes across as even vaguely interesting is in Nightmares. The Annointed One is worse, if anything. Creepy small children can be very effective if done well; unfortunately this is a ptime example of the opposite. As regards the over-arching plot of the series, I don't think series one has anything really to recommend it at all. It's saved from total awfulness by a small number of excellent self-contained episodes (Nightmares, Witch and The Pack, in that order, in my opinion, though a few others are also watchable). |
| 9. | NixJan 11, 2008 (Fri)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| What's worst about the Anointed One is that *nothing is done with him*. He's a gun on the mantelpiece introduced with great portentuousness --- and what's the sum total of his actions? To lead Buffy down into the Master's cave. Any random vamp could do that, not that they needed to because Buffy knew where it was anyway and was going there herself at the time. |
| 10. | leeMay 4, 2008 (Sun)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| i did like season one but you cant really compare it to the rest, its never gonna be better than the rest. its just too short, and they had to stick to the basics really and introduce the show. Thats it, it was like an intro to buffy proper. there is a few little gems in there too, like harvest and the pack. |
| 11. | JadenMay 17, 2008 (Sat)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| the sad thing about this season is that it is actually unnecisary to the series (which is something that no show should be able to say about its first season). as mike has been doing for his friends, it would be the same (most likely better) to start straight off from season 2 without dragging through season 1 which has a very slow pace and will most likely turn people off the series before it even starts! i mean the other seasons did a great job fleshing out what would otherwise be one-dimensional characters, something that other shows never fully achieve. however one thing that i have to say is great is that since the series starts off bad it can almost certainly be guaranteed to get better. i mean look at shows like prisonbreak and alias and then look at shows like friends and 24. the former shows had excellent first seasons but were left with nothing but decline whearas the latter had mediocre beginings but got better and better with each season. |
| 12. | DarknessLostprophetsMay 28, 2008 (Wed)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I must say i partially disagree with your season one review of buffy the vampire slayer, obviously overall compared to the other seasons, most revelant in this case season two three five and seven, which in my opinion are the better seasons, season six being intresting for other reasons, i.e character development, and season four being utter nonsense, minus faith and angel's return and restless and primevil, highlights of the entire 22 episode season, anyway back to my original point. I believe that season one is simply 'starting out', its the baby steps in the coming to adult part of ones life, its like the first day of starting a new school, you meet new people who will be important in your life and you struggle with your future and the person you are now, in buffy's case, the slayer and the girl buffy. Certain episodes, i believe are pivotol in creating the buffylore, which becomes the basis of the entire buffyverse, episodes like welcome to the hellmouth, the harvest, angel and prophecy girl, in particular are my favourites as it chronicled the first year of what it meant to be the sunnydale slayer, maybe not superbly but it touched upon it. However i must admit, it is mainly buffy, and only buffy alone that develops as a character, notbly cordelia [shows hints of insight in out of sight, out of mind]and willow also. The master, i must admit is an adequate villian, i think that was the point, he was 'the vampire' foe of sunnydale, and the whole being stuck underground is to not only stretch the season to twelve episodes, but to also explore different supernatural elements in the buffyverse, i.e. witches demons etc. and also to allow the entire budget to stretch as its obvious that the makers were aware that this could be a one season show, thats why the purposefully round of everything in prophecy girl, but im extremley glad buffy continued for another six year. Overall, i think season one isn't perfect, but its crediable to welcoming people to the buffy world as its more apporachable, could this be said for season 6, no, because you need to have follow the characters from seasons one to five to comprehend and enjoy season 6. Buffy started out ok and went on to become the best show on television |
| 13. | NixMay 28, 2008 (Wed)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| DarknessLostprophets, you didn't like Hush or Something Blue? Passing strange... Season four has a crappy plotline but it has some excellent individual episodes (counterbalanced somewhat by a couple of truly awful ones). Oh, it's not the first year, either: in internal chronology it's half a year long. And you don't have to start at the beginning. I started out in the Buffyverse with season 5, and while I lost some fascinating linkups (the Restless / Dracula connections) and the Dawn introduction obviously wasn't exactly shocking (look! a new character! ... everyone's a new character) it *did* work. And I say that as a completist who promptly watched everything from s1 on, in order :) |
| 14. | DarknesLostprophetsMay 28, 2008 (Wed)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| oh i throughly enjoyed hush i miss that out, forgive me for that, that was one of the best episodes for buffy, as it was totally different from anything previously done in the show. Something blue on the other hand humoured me but not to the extent that i would call it an memorable episode, its only popular due to the whole spike and buffy thing, dont get me started on the crapness of spike in the later buffy years as that will be a rant that will last 10 years! :P I do love spike dearly but i felt in the end of season 6 and throughout season 7, he was a weak loser, with him being depicted as the next angel, the whole vampire with a soul thing, he completely lost his edge of which made him so entertaining and addictive On the note of the watching buffy from the beginning, didn't you at all feel obilivous to particular references of the past of which you never knew of, due the fact of not watching previous seasons? buffy is like a movie, and season 5 for me is like the second to end section of the movie, but thats just my opinion |
| 15. | Exit8buffyJan 19, 2009 (Mon)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Although good, season one of BtVS was really bad. I hate to say this but it really improves over the years -- a good thing. After S1 things picked up -- the evil Angel story arc and everything... |
| 16. | LucyAug 5, 2009 (Wed)View This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I can see I'm in the minority here, but I LOVED the master! I just thought he was hilarious. Not my absolute favourite Big Bad, but better than Adam at least! |
| 17. | AndrewJan 23, 2010 (Sat) @ 7:20amView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Hm, again. I think I might be persuaded that the Master was better than Adam. At least he was clearly silly, whereas the series seemed to be trying to get you to take Adam seriously. But compared to the Mayor, or season 2 Spike, or Angelus, or even Glory, he's a bit rubbish. |
| 18. | Nathan.TaurusMar 25, 2010 (Thu) @ 8:04pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| The Good: 'Welcome to the Hellmouth', 'The Pack', 'Angel', 'Nightmares' and 'Prophecy Girl'. The Master. The beginning of the greatest show ever. Principal Flutie. Amy Madison. Xander badass. Jesse dies. Sarah cute and sexy. Realisation of future relationship failure. The Scoobies stage debut. Willow growing up.
The Bad: The annoying teen talk, eg: "What's the sitch" and more that I have pushed to the back of my brain. Xander skateboarding. Jesse dies. Harmony. The Ugly: 'I, Robot...You, Jane'. The amount of bullets in Darlas gun. |
| 19. | GuidoMar 25, 2010 (Thu) @ 11:32pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I'm with Lucy. I think The Master is entertaining as hell. I've only seen the series twice through—once when it aired, and the second time within the last year or so. I'm on my 3rd re-watch (finishing Season 3). Each time I've watched Season 1, I regard it solely on it's own merits. In other words, I pretend that it is the only season of Buffy to have ever aired. Would you still like the show? Yes! Season 1 is what it is. Many reviewers compare and contrast this season with later seasons, which isn't fair. The show didn't know it was going to last, didn't know there would ever be a Spike, or an Anya, and only had a half-season to set things in motion. The only historical context applicable to Season 1 is Buffy the movie. Aside from Joss' vision, it had no other standard upon which to guide itself. To say that The Master was the "worst" demon is to say that, somehow, Joss Whedon should have known that and made The Master better. Nonsense. This contextual approach enshrouds Season 1 with the expectations of later episodes that hadn't even seen the light of day. Season 1 is pure innocence. Re-watching this season is like going through an old photo album. Some awkward moments might come to mind, but the nostalgia is as deep as ever. |
| 20. | G1000Jun 5, 2010 (Sat) @ 5:12pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| By far "Buffy's" worst season. It's not even close. "Angel" is the only episode that even comes close to matching the best of seasons 2-7 (though I also like "Never Kill a Boy on the First Date", "Welcome to the Hellmouth"/"The Harvest" and "The Puppet Show").
The rest are absolutely terrible. It says a lot about how bad this season is that the four worst episodes of "Buffy" ever all came from here ("Nightmares", "Out of Mind, Out of Sight", "The Pack", and "Teacher's Pet"). Oddly enough, I don't hate "I Robot, You Jane" as much as most (although it's pretty bad). I honestly don't know how "Buffy" got a second-season renewal based on this season. I'm so glad it did, but I still don't know how. |
| 21. | SusanJul 31, 2010 (Sat) @ 9:47amView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I did not see Buffy or Angel episodes when they were first aired but only through repeats on cable TV and later on DVD. So initially I saw many episodes out of order but found enough enjoyment to want to see both series from start to finish. The first season of Buffy didn't really appeal to me at first but I stuck with it because I wanted to see everything in the proper sequence. The first couple times that I went through season one I did it out of a sense of duty so that I could work my way through to the episodes that I knew I would enjoy. I started from the beginning again a couple weeks ago, and watching late at night I was half asleep and found myself dozing through the familiar scenes. Then I went back to read mikejer's reviews and the comments of everyone else on individual episodes and suddenly it was a whole new world. With help from reviews and comments I carefully rewatched many of the episodes including Never Kill a Boy on the First Date, Nightmares, and Puppet Show. For the first time, I was able to see much more significance in these shows, not just for their wittiness and insight into character, but also in development of future storylines. However, I can't imagine noticing or caring about many of these issues if I had been watching originally on network tv with commercial interruptions. I can't tell you how very glad I am that enough people did see through what appeared to be rather shallow plotlines for this wonderful show to be renewed and to continue for six more years. Thanks to all of you! |
| 22. | SeleneSep 5, 2010 (Sun) @ 4:08pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| This was indeed a weak season with some truly atrocious episodes, but then it was a mid-season replacement show based on an unsuccessful film that Fox Network was neither heavily promoting, nor pumping money into. I think when you take these factors into account you can understand why it fails to live up to future seasons. |
| 23. | John RobertsSep 9, 2010 (Thu) @ 12:27pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Just watched the entire first season, after seeing maybe 15 episodes (?) of the series a decade ago when it was live. For some reason, back in the day I saw a few Year 1 episodes and then nothing until Year 6 ... which was really weird ... Buffy's mom disappeared, Buffy was now Momming some jailbait girl, Willow turned into a witch, all so bizarre.
At any rate, I'm willing and happy to believe that the series gets better in the subsequent seasons. But ... surely you collectively jest in wondering why it was picked up for a second season. A cheesy, limping, tentative BtVS that is lurching through its first few baby steps is fresher, funnier, cleverer, and yes even scarier, than just about anything else out there. From Episode 1, the quality comes through. |
| 24. | JasonSep 9, 2010 (Thu) @ 2:43pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| John Roberts: I like your writing style, and your insights. Your opinions so far largely coincide with mine. Keep the posts coming. |
| 25. | G1000Sep 15, 2010 (Wed) @ 6:13pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| John, got to disagree with you that a "cheesy, limping tenative BtVS" is better than just about anything else. Season 1 of this show was the single worst season of TV I've ever watched in my entire life. No, I'm not kidding.
If it hadn't gotten better in season 2, I'd have never forgiven myself for wasting that much time with it. That's how bad this season is (apart from a few episodes like "Angel" and "Welcome to the Hellmouth"). |
| 26. | TonyOct 11, 2010 (Mon) @ 2:25pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Hmm. I don't know why season 1 gets so little love here. For me, so many memorable scenes and episodes, from Willow saying "why" instead of "hi" when Buffy first greets her, to social psychological commentary like the Hyenas episode, and to three of the most memorable and chilling episodes (the witch, the puppet, and out of sight - in my book, the witch is the closest to actually destroying Buffy, and the ending of Out of Sight was more chilling than anything the Initiative in season 4 could muster). Season 1 does an admirable and exciting job of laying the foundations for the rest of the series. And it's the season I remember which focuses the most on, and best depicts, the woes and goofiness of high school. It's a can't miss season in my book. |
| 27. | TonyOct 11, 2010 (Mon) @ 3:33pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Just want to add that the episode-enders for season 1 were only so-so for me. It's really the stand alone episodes - Witch, Puppet, and Out so Sight - that I love from this season. Just the perfect bland of humor, scariness, pathos, dialogue, pacing, and social commentary. The season-ending episode I love the most, by far, is the one at the end of season 2 - that one can't be touched! :) |
| 28. | CoyoteBuffyFanFeb 5, 2011 (Sat) @ 12:44pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I said it in my Welcome to the Hellmouth comments but I'll repeat here: What I like about this season is that it had some fun stories but it really cemented the personalities of the characters and their dynamics. I don't mind that there wasn't a lot of growth in most of them. We just got to learn about them and find out their quirks through the series of stories that were told. I'm glad the formula was ditched in subsequent seasons but I really fell in love with the characters right from the get go with this series and from that standpoint, it succeeds. This sets us right up for their emotional development through the rest of the series. |
| 29. | mordcordyMar 17, 2011 (Thu) @ 3:31pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| lol you got a pic of xander on the Giles file. Love your analysis mike as always and thanks for the cool S1 screencaps! |
| 30. | ConorMar 29, 2011 (Tue) @ 2:21pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| When I first watched Season 1 back in the late 1990s, my reaction was mixed. While I sort of liked it, it certainly didn't hook me and I soon lost interest in the show. Revisiting the season for the first time in many years, I find it difficult to describe how impressed I was with what I had traditionally regarded as a fairly ineffectual starter season to a truly epic television show. While the budget is clearly lower and the plots and characterisation more one-dimensional in comparison with what is to come, the writers really managed to lay a solid foundation for the series in the course of just a dozen episodes - and produce a reasonably enjoyable season of television to boot. I also feel that I got more out of the season by virtue of my present status as a well-established Buffy fan. I know the quality of the show under scrutiny and can be more patient with this season and its content (and more forgiving of any defects) than a more casual viewer seeing this for the first time is liable to be.
The core Scoobies are generally well-handled. Their development is still very far from complete by season's end, but that's to be expected under the circumstances. Preppy, sixteen-year-old Buffy is a very likeable character. She has her issues, but fortunately these don't weigh her down like they will in later seasons. Willow is still unbelievably innocent and nerdy, her major crush on Xander simulataneously adorable and bemusing given the changes she will go through both as a person and in terms of her sexuality in the years to come. Xander's reputation as an essentially likeable character who nevertheless maintains a tendency to annoy the audience is also apparent here, in that it is so blatantly obvious that Buffy has zero sexual or romantic interest in him and yet he persists in his ridiculously hopeless pursuit of her, all the while ignoring the amourous yearnings of his close friend, Willow, who genuinely loves him - albeit in a distinctly teenage puppy love kind of way. Giles reminds me of a cooler, less cowardly version of Season 3's Wesley. Very stereotypically British, utterly bookish and still naively fascinated by the Californian climate and the supernatural forces that permeate Sunnydale. Although his relationship with Buffy starts out as a mentor-pupil one, by the end of the season the father-daughter relationship between them so central to this series until Season 6 is already beginning to reveal itself. Angel's development begins in the episode of the same name and, after a shaky initial role in the very early episodes (and some hammy acting on David Boreanaz's part), his character begins to fall into place from that point onwards. The mainly female major secondary figures - Joyce, Cordelia, Jenny Calendar and Darla - are all well presented and acted, though with the exception of Joyce all have a long way to go before they become truly developed characters in their own right. Not until "Out of Mind, Out of Sight" does Cordelia procure any form of substantive character development - spending most of the season as a forgettable high school cliche - and Darla, though excellent use is made of her limited screen time, won't really come into her own until Season 2 of Angel. Jenny's role is best described as minor here. I personally felt that one of the biggest draws of this season was in its heavy use of horror elements. While this was something that continued throughout the series in general, in Season 1 the horror feels a lot less diluted. Dark magical forces still feel alien, ominous and deserving of dread precisely because they are so new - to both the viewer and the Scoobies - and the rules of the Buffyverse aren't yet properly laid out. Somehow, the monsters and villains seem a whole lot edgier and scarier than their counterparts in later season. Even the vampires look and feel more animalistic, more vicious, more...vampiric. It just feels as though an attempt was being made to blend genuine horror with teen drama - and the horror element was brought to the fore in a manner that would have been impossible later in the series, when the Buffyverse (at least as depicted in BtVS) became overly saturated with demonic forces and figures to the point where demons could be found round every corner, routinely socialising in their own (apparently easily accessible) bars and the horror overtones were completely downplayed in favour of the drama. The Master is also a pretty decent first season Big Bad, though I found the manner of his demise disappointingly underwhelming, as I had hoped for a more prolonged and memorable final showdown between this centuries-old vampire and the young Slayer. In terms of episode quality, I would say that the quality was reasonably good, all things considered, with "Welcome to the Hellmouth", "Witch", "Teacher's Pet", "Never Kill A Boy On the First Date", "Angel", "The Pack", "The Puppet Show", "Nightmares" and "Prophecy Girl" all ranking highly in my book. In fact, there were only two episodes that I would regard as particularly weak - "Out of Mind, Out of Sight", which, aside from transforming Cordelia into an actual flesh-and-blood character, did little for me - and "I Robot...You Jane", an episode whose minor redeeming qualities could not rescue it from the bowels of mediocrity. My favourite episode would probably be "The Pack", which combined a very quirky and original storyline with great character work and some genuinely creepy concepts and scenes. The finale was good but not in the same league as some of its later season counterparts. All in all, Season 1 was a fun and accessible introduction to what would become one of the greatest television series' of its respective era. Though certainly flawed, with a lesser amount of character development and more basic overall plotlines than what came to pass in later seasons, it remains an unfairly maligned early venture into the Buffyverse that I feel deserves greater credit and applaud than fans have traditionally conferred upon it. |
| 31. | MikeJerApr 28, 2011 (Thu) @ 1:01amView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| ADMIN NOTE: This season review has been completely rewritten. In light of this, references to the old review have been edited out of the the above comments. |
| 32. | fray-adjacentApr 28, 2011 (Thu) @ 12:27pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Nice review. Your distinction between serialized plot and serialized characterization is key, and also highly relevant to Seasons 4 and 7, where they somewhat failed at the former but still, to a large extent, succeeded at the latter. Every time I rewatch season 4, I'm less bothered by the Adam plot and more impressed by the character development. I think the moment of depth they gave Cordelia in "Out of Mind, Out of Sight" -- and the follow-through on that development afterward -- was the first time I began the recognize the specialness of the show. Prior to that, I had absolutely no faith that she'd be anything other than a caricature. Like most fans at CT, I like Season 1 the least, but I still enjoy the charm and even the camp. I very much agree with you that it succeeds at creating a group of likable characters with a great dynamic and excellent dialog. I'm watching Buffy with a friend (her first time), and I skipped half of S1, only showing "Welcome to the Hellmouth", "The Harvest", "Never Kill a Boy on the First Date", "Angel", "Nightmares", and "Prophecy Girl." (I skipped OoMOoS despite the initial impact it had on me.) Now I think that's a mistake: flawed as season 1 is, the way it establishes the characters and their relationships is probably important in getting a viewer to really care about them. My friend didn't really get sucked in until "The Body"! (I also skipped a number of early S2 episodes, so she missed a lot of the early Buffy/Angel relationship that you referenced in your review. I think that's why the Angelus arc didn't pull her in like it does most people.) |
| 33. | buffyholicApr 29, 2011 (Fri) @ 1:28amView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Great job Mike. I especially like your Pros section because it is so true. Rewatching the season multiple times is really something amazing because the characters have no idea what will happen in the future and they are so happy here in contrast with later seasons. Also I have to add that these characters really draw me in like no other character or show has done before. |
| 34. | smallprint84Apr 29, 2011 (Fri) @ 7:25amView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Yeah, very good job on reviewing the first season. Thanks a lot.
But I have a question for you, Mike: So when do you complete the reviews for Angel S4 and 5? |
| 35. | MikeJerApr 29, 2011 (Fri) @ 12:00pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| The answer is 'never,' smallprint. If you jump over to the Angel site you'll notice that the community is finishing up Angel. I will, however, be contributing a handful of Angel reviews soon. Keep your eye on the news feed over there for updates. |
| 36. | buffyholicMay 31, 2011 (Tue) @ 7:15amView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I am looking forward for your S2 re-reviews. I´m sure it´s gonna be great. |
| 37. | xfactorAug 11, 2011 (Thu) @ 1:55amView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I look at the heart of a show. And in contrast to the sadistic nightmare that ruins season 6, the floundering bore of season 7, and the two worst decisions made in this series (Riley as a believable love interest for Buffy and Dawn) that cripple seasons 4 and 5, season 1 had the right balance of the sweetness and the sarcasm, the funny and the heartstrings. It had heart. |
| 38. | Sweet JOct 9, 2011 (Sun) @ 7:16pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I agree xfactor, Season 1 get's a bad rap but in hindsight with a total of 12 episodes it's actually pretty good considering it has episodes like- Nightmares, Out of mind out of Sight, The Puppet show, Angel, and The Witch. I'd watch them all again before I'd watch six episodes from season 5,6 or 7, any day! |
| 39. | LouisaOct 27, 2011 (Thu) @ 11:43pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| I saw Buffy for the first time in Season 4. Within a minute or two, I understood that I'd been missing out and needed to track every episode I'd missed and see them all, in order if possible. I liked going back and seeing the Scooby gang when they were babies, but the best thing about Season 1 is seeing how the show went from where it started to OMG after the cast and crew all figured out what they could do. |
| 40. | Gemma Dec 5, 2011 (Mon) @ 1:09pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Hi Mike, let me start first by saying that i enjoy reading your reviews and respect all the points you make. I agree with most of what you say on mass but there is one fundamental thing i do partly disagree with, and this is Inaugural season of BtVS. Put simply i adore it, i think its one of televisions gems! While i agree with you points on the season being based largely on the monster of the week theme and some of the plots being contrived. I can't not fall in love with this season and what it does. As Buffy said in WELCOME TO THE HELLMOUTH "it wasn't that bad". The innocence and the colourful dialogue are just two of the seasons good points. For me this season is my comfort blanket. I saw it on its first run and loved it. Falling in love with Buffy, Willow, Xander and Giles was easy. For me the way each of the characters are introduced in their own is breathe taking. Especially looking at retrospectively and knowing how much they will grow and change, the challenges they will all face and overcome. Season 1 for me has a childlike innocence and its been hard for me to find a show with the same ability. Yes some of the monsters were corny, some of the plots didn't escalate to their best ability and some couldn't say what they were trying to but this season did do one or two things that i will always cherish it for. It brought to life Buffy the Vampire Slayer. A show i share a lot with, my ups and downs. Not only this but this season lays the foundations and the amazing ground work for what the show becomes, right from the very first episode when it introduces the fictional world we all know, love and desire to be apart of. Each time i watch this season i watch with children's eyes. This season endeavours to be something and by Nightmares its done it for me. |
| 41. | x factorDec 19, 2011 (Mon) @ 1:00pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Yes, this season differentiates the hardcore, original BTVS fans from those that came on late.
What's funny to me is that this season gets bashed, yet it somehow managed to jumpstart an entire TV genre that turned mythic with Seasons 2 and 3. It was responsible for the explosion of BTVS pop culture that followed. Somehow, through all these allegedly "crappy" episodes, Joss managed to turn his franchise into an icon. The show really hit its stride mid season 1 around Never Kill a Boy and didnt missfire until season 4. Meanwhile, seasons 6 and 7 had the exact opposite effect - they turned off the fanbase, getting longtime fans to lose interest in the show, getting even SMG to publicly admit that season 6 wasnt Buffy. By season 7, everyone was pretty much going through the motions with contrived storylines and just outright boring stretches. |
| 42. | MikeJerDec 19, 2011 (Mon) @ 1:40pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| x factor: why are you here? It's clearly not to engage in a discussion of the reviews, because you have yet to do that. It seems like you just want a place to vent your unrefined thoughts and emotions, and this is just the place you decided to stop for a while. This site isn't a Buffy episode guide, if you haven't noticed; there's actual analysis up at the top that you're encouraged to read, think about, and debate with. If you really want to continue completely ignoring the analysis on this site and endlessly go on about how you feel, you should really just get a site of your own. That's the whole point. So I ask again: if you're not here for an actual discussion of the material (both the show and my analysis), why are you here? |
| 43. | Gemma Dec 19, 2011 (Mon) @ 2:17pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| X Factor, I disagree with regarding season six and seven completely, the series on a whole needed to explore the somewhat darker side to Buffy when she returned from heaven. She was in a turbulent place. Her life had stopped whereas her friends were in positions and time frames within their own that had meaning and gave direction to where they were headed. Buffy wasn't going to simply get over her being dead and feeling alone. Season seven saw her having to come to turns with that and utilised her new found peace and place within her world. Both were amazing seasons but they weren't flawless. Season one like any other season receives diverging reviews; put simply not every body loves the same ice cream flavour but that doesn't mean that any of them are bad. Everyone's opinion matters. I value and understand what your points are but you need to support them and not simply bash. |
| 44. | x factorDec 19, 2011 (Mon) @ 6:32pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| MikeJer...I think it's pretty clear what my points are. I completely disagree with the final grade you gave this season. In case you haven't noticed, I'm not alone in feeling that the bashing given to season 1 by you in your review and others on this comment thread is misguided.
Sure, season 1 has its flaws. Its kind of hokey, production values are really bad, we dont have the same refined plot arc as the others. Lots of one-off episodes. But my point is that this season, unlike the dross that signifies the later seasons, has something those seasons will never have - it got people to CARE about these characters, to invest themselves in this show. This season has heart - they have fun, they laugh, sometimes at themselves, they get hurt, they deal, they suffer, they learn. The episodes are entertaining, and occasionally poignant. Joss got you to care about them. Can the same be said of season 6 or 7? Not judging by the fanbases that got almost completely turned off by them. Even SMG herself publicly admitted that season 6 wasnt Buffy. So yes, i think my comments are very relevant to this thread since it supposedly deals with the entire season. This is how i would grade the seasons: S2 = A S3 = A- S1 = B+/A- S5 = C+ S6 = C S4 = D+ S7 = D- So isnt it obvious why i vehemently disagree with 99% of your grades and why I vehemently denounce the later seasons? If you want i will gladly post up specific thoughts on individual epis. |
| 45. | Gemma Dec 20, 2011 (Tue) @ 4:05amView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| Season 6 was about Buffy finding herself, being lost after the high school years and being brought back. The scenes were emotional and the season was a dark one. Gellar did say that this was a particularly hard season for her because she was Buffy and found it hard to remove herself from the part. She later went on to say that may have been the problem, she may have not been able to see the struggles the character; Buffy, was going through, struggling to find herself. In the same interview Joss said that he did recall a time when he said ok we need to bring Buffy back now, we've lost her. But my own view is that the show is about a woman who i look up to, a woman who tells you what to do to show the right path and the clear message that everyone deals with pain, feels alone and goes through a lot no matter who you are. Buffy was a powerful woman not merely physically but emotionally too, she sacrificed the love of her life to save the world, she dealt with her moms death and felt different to other girls. The episode The Prom is one of my favourites because Buffy got recognition, she was valued and people did notice her. It was like the fans thanking her for being herself. Buffy as a show and as a character was an inspiration. However i can understand that to represent this on TV sometimes there has to be moments of triumphing over adversity in both her personal and monster killing life ergo Buffy at times has to suffer. Season six was her triumphing slowly. Season seven was the lighter side, Buffy had succeeded in overcoming the pain and the stepping back in to her life, she was Buffy again. Buffy re-surfaced. I think that to say Joss and the cast didn't care and love the show or the characters that many fans fell in love with and wanted to be is a little unfair, Buffy was a much loved show, I don't think the quality of the show dipped in season 6 at all, people and to be honest first time round there were a few scenes and moments that i didn't like but looking retrospectively i have a new found respect for the season, i didn't understand the struggles Buffy was going through and WIllow, Dawn all of them really but now i do. This may have been similar for other fans of the show? They may have misinterpreted the mood of the season. Season 7 has some fun and light hearted episodes similar to season one; Him and Helpless for instance, Lessons? Others were deep such as CWDP and Chosen. The only problem i have with this season is that i know its the end which is said and that The First is under used in a few of the episodes. Season one is my favourite along with season 3, 2 and 6. I would score them as follows; Season 1 A- because of its magic and innocence, it was fun and nice to see the characters without any worries. Light hearted :) season 2 - B+/A loved this season for the new place Buffy was in after the events of Prophecy Girl, stand alone episodes such as School Hard, Halloween, Killed by Death, Ted, Inca Mummy Girl, Phases and Lie to Me. The two parters were amazing and the villains of the season were cool. I rated it a little low because of Reptile Boy, SAR, and Bad eggs. Season 3 A+ Loved it! Season 4 C+ enjoyed the Buffy at college, the fashion got better too! The humour in Pangs, Something Blue, A New Man. Episodes such as the Faith two parters, Willow and Tara and Oz, Fear itself and Harsh light of day. Restless. I rated low because of the main plot arch, not amazing but the show and the writers created some great stand alone episodes, a credit to their abilities, much like the creation of season one. I agree BtVS did start the phenomenon. Season 5 B+ i liked the ideas, the episodes were spot on in balancing comedy and drama but i disliked one or two episodes and was waiting for Riley to disappear. Season 6 A I thought this season was insightful, it showed Buffy coming to grips, finding herself and it had a nice mix of comedy and drama, the acting too was great. The Trio were fun to watch. Season 7 B I like the idea of The First, it just felt a little under developed. Also the Potentials really took Buffy back to its roots with the mythology, one girl in all the world. The high school too! The stand alone gems in the first half and Faith in the latter. Caleb was a great arm of The First. The knowing Buffy lives and that she isn't alone any more in being different, her acceptance that there isn't anything wrong with it either. The above are my opinions, as i said everyone is entitled to have them. |
| 46. | MikeJerDec 20, 2011 (Tue) @ 12:09pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| First of all, x factor, please stop continuously referencing Sarah Michelle Gellar's thoughts on Season 6 -- it doesn't mean much. You treat her at-the-time comments as if they're the final word on the entire season's worth. They're not. (1) She's an actor, not a writer. (2) Being only one part of a large production gave her a narrow window into what the season was trying to accomplish. SMG didn't have the opportunity to sit back and really evaluate the scope of the season with some distance between her and the material. (3) SMG's opinion doesn't invalidate anyone else's. A work of art means something different to different people -- that's the whole point.
There's really not much else to say. You not only have a penchant for completely ignoring the actual content of my reviews, by instead placing this huge emphasis on the final score, but you also appear to be ignoring the content of my comments as well. I never said your "points" were unclear. You don't agree with what you've interpreted as my overall impression of the seasons of this show, and you aren't actually reading any my reviews or, if you are, you aren't processing anything other than the final score. Which brings me back to the question in my previous comment that you also ignored: why are you here? Why not go put your thoughts on your own blog or something? In your last comment, you posted a list of grades to the respective seasons and said "isn't it obvious why I disagree with you?" Let me be clear with you: you don't disagree with me, except in the most broad and loose way imaginable, because in order to do that you would actually have to tell me what you disagree with. You've never responded to any actual points I've made in any review. You just make generalized statements about what you do or don't like. If you don't emotionally connect with something, that's fine -- I can respect that. If you don't agree with my arguments for a particular season or episode, that's also fine, as long as you make a coherent counter-argument. But there's more to putting together a substantive analysis of something than your immediate emotional response. It's called critical thinking. When you are commenting on my review, the burden is on you to debate the points I've made that you disagree with. What you're currently doing is bypassing my arguments and just stating what you think. That kind of comment belongs on your own site, not in response to someone else's review. |
| 47. | x factorDec 20, 2011 (Tue) @ 1:44pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| What i find funny is that you are so focused on the fact that my comments dont respond to the substantive points in your review. There are MULTIPLE comments on this very thread that made absolutely no reference to your review, and yet you choose to single MY comments out?
Let's be real, sir. This has nothing to do with whether my statements relate to your review. You just dont like the fact that I disagree with your views and i do so strongly and with passion. And you dont like the fact that a lot of folks agree with me about Buffy jumping the shark after season 3, whether it be with Riley, the Dawn storyline, B/S, or season 7. And BTW, I HAVE responded directly to your reviews by pointing out your flawed grades. Arent your grades part of the "substance" of your review? I've also disagreed with multiple points you've made about this season and the other seasons. And finally, if anyone is getting "emotional", it is you not me. If you cant handle criticism of what you write, which is ALL opinions and interpretation just like mine are, then a public website may not be the best place to offer your work. If you do not like to have your grades challenged, feel free to delete my comments. |
| 48. | MikeJerDec 20, 2011 (Tue) @ 3:41pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| First of all, there's not much emotion here, except maybe a bemused curiosity. The grades I give things are the least important part of the review, by a wide margin. Arguing about the grade is pointless if you don't understand why I gave something that grade. That's what the actual review is for. Your first comment on this particular review repeated the exact same thing you've said in a bunch of other reviews. To paraphrase: you hate Seasons 6-7, and love Seasons 1-3. We all get it. I only responded here because you're going around a whole bunch of reviews saying the exact same thing -- it's getting old. In each comment, most if not all of the things you're either praising or condemning are actually addressed directly in my respective review of that season/episode. Yet you have consistently ignored these points and said your piece anyway. In your second comment, to correct your assertion that you made no reference to this review, you did reference it: "MikeJer...I think it's pretty clear what my points are. I completely disagree with the final grade you gave this season." Again, you referenced the grade, but who really cares about the grade in of itself? I know I don't. What is it you disagree with that I actually wrote? What are the points I made that you disagree with, specifically, and why? You never say, in this review, or any other, and that's the entire problem. All you appear to care about is the grade, which is only meant as a summary of how I evaluated something. The meat of the evaluation, and where the grade comes from, is the content of the review itself. It's times like these that I want to remove scores/grades from the site altogether, because they're ultimately not important and clearly some people get really worked up over them. There have been plenty of people that have intelligently criticized what I've written and engaged me in great debates over the years. I've been running this site for quite a long time now, over six years, and there's a thriving community of regulars that appreciate the atmosphere it provides. None of them agree with me on everything I've written. Some of them disagree with a lot of it. Yet I love debating with them nonetheless. I have absolutely no problem with real debate, and have very consistently encouraged it, as I did with you in my previous comment. But in order to debate something I've written, you actually have to, well, debate it, with specific counter-arguments to the points I made and the conclusions I arrived at. Forget the grade; debate the substance. |
| 49. | AaronJerDec 20, 2011 (Tue) @ 8:25pmView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| x-factor, just give some specific points. So far you've said little more than "I don't like later seasons because they are bad." I'm sure you have some actual opinions on specific events that occurred, please share them. The only reason MJ is responding to you negatively is because you're saying "I don't like such and such." Then MJ says, "Why?" And you pretty much just say "Because it's bad." You said before "If you want i will gladly post up specific thoughts on individual epis." <--- That. Do that. You have yet to do that. Nothing you say serves any purpose until you do that. |
| 50. | AlexDec 21, 2011 (Wed) @ 2:21amView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| x-factor, I don't think it's fair to say that Mike doesn't like people disagreeing with him. Plenty of people do so on this site, and it can make for some really fun discussion - but only if you're prepared to say more than just 'Mike, you're wrong'. Please do give us your thoughts on the seasons and why you prefer the earlier ones. And while it's great that you like the earlier seasons more than the later ones, please don't assume that every true Buffy fan has to agree with you. I actually meant to reply to some of your comments a while back, because from several of them I get the strong impression that you have a big problem with the Buffy/Spike relationship and, in particular, the S+M aspects of it. I find that interesting - why do you dislike it so much? You don't have to reply here, but it would be great if you went back to one of those comments and elaborated a bit because, believe it or not, not everyone shares that view. |
| 51. | Gemma Feb 3, 2012 (Fri) @ 11:39amView This Person's Comments | Link | |
| A rough diamond, these are the words that sum up this season for me. I value these 12 episodes immensely, all of them divergent individual little gems. The writing, the characters and those intangible moments, the humour and the emotions, most importantly the way the four key characters bond. These relationships whether they be friendship or the beginning of romance or parental ones is what resonates with me. I agree Mike that Buffy herself is the foundation, the building blocks in this season. I love Buffy always have, always will. She is my ultimate role model, her strength and ability to face all odds with courage. I second the agreement of her being both the sacrificial lamb and the hunter, have you also noticed that when ever she lays her life on the line; twice literally, she wears white? Prophecy girl, The Gift, When she is stabbed in Chosen she is wearing a white shirt, even in season six when she is shot by Warren she has a white top under her jacket, which may be a pale grey or perhaps white itself! The pros out number the cons for me when it comes to the season, i appreciate that i may be in the minority when it comes to expressing my joy and love of this season, i hold it right up there, it being close to my favourite actually coming second! |
| - | Post a Comment |
|
Name
(NOTE: Before posting your opinion on this episode, please remember to read the review, be respectful of opposing opinions, and to competently use at least basic spelling and grammar. The administrator has the right to remove a comment at any time.) (*** copy your comment in case of failure!!! ***) Security Code |