[LIGHT  |  DARK] NAVIGATE: CRITICALLYTOUCHED.COM Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Get the news with RSS!
homereviewsarticleslinksdiscussion
<<News
- Quick Links


- About the Site

Welcome to Mike Marinaro's (a.k.a. MikeJer) home for in-depth Buffy the Vampire Slayer reviews, articles, links, and discussion. If you wish to learn more about who I am, jump to the About Me section. As time permits I will be, at a moderate pace, going through every single episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. I will be taking notes for my reviews and will approach them from many angles including fun factor, character development, foreshadowing, pacing, and more. Please be aware that most of my reviews contain SPOILERS of not only the episode reviewed, but of episodes potentially anywhere in the entire series. I have already seen the entire series several times on DVD. The purpose of these reviews is to not only share my opinion on the episodes and seasons with others, but also to attempt to unravel the many layers of depth this series offers.

One of the most exciting things for me to do when re-watching these episodes is to notice things I never saw before, especially instances of foreshadowing. I would also like to mention that I am not a professional writer nor an English Major, so there will undoubtedly be errors in my writing. I'd like to encourage you to let me know about these errors so I can correct them. E-mail or PM via the forums is preferred for this (see below for address).

I love BtVS so much I want to share that appreciation with other fans of the show. I also am frustrated by the lack of good review sites for this or any other television show. Most sites don't have everything I want in them. For example, one site will have great episode reviews, but no season reviews. Or vice versa. Which also reminds me, if any of you want something on the site that isn't here, let me know, I might just want it on the site too.

Keep in mind that these reviews will not be going up on a regular basis. It all depends on when I have chunks of spare time. One day I may put up three or four reviews while I also may not put up any for a week or two. Who knows, maybe it might be more consistent than that, but I can't guarantee anything. After an entire season has been reviewed, I will do a comprehensive review of the season as a whole and display the average episode score for that season as well as my own personal score.

From time to time I may get an urge to write up an article about something involving the show. If and when I post an article it will be located in the Articles section. I plan on posting a notice in the news section above (with a date) when I put up any new content. Anyway, I hope you enjoy these reviews as much as I enjoy writing them. Feel free to send me questions or comments to mikejer(at)gmail(dot)com.

I recommend starting to read my reviews at "When She Was Bad" [2x01], as my Season 1 reviews are not up to snuff with what came after it and will, in time, be completely rewritten. Or you can simply click on the 'reviews' link above to access my entire database of Buffy reviews. Note that you can add your own comment to any review at the bottom of that review. The 'podcast' link will take you to a list of my own mp3 recordings discussing various aspects of the Buffyverse in greater detail. The 'links' section is a collection of links that I've found particularly useful or fun. Additionally, the 'discussion' section is a forum to discuss any and all things in the Whedonverse. I will moderate this forum the best I can to weed out any nonsense. Feel free to chat about my reviews as I love extra discussion. You could point something out I never thought of, and that's always a good thing.



- About Me

I have a B.S. in Computer Science from Western Washington University. I currently live in Kirkland, WA and work with the Xbox LIVE Operations Team as a Tools/Automation/Web Developer. My name is Mikelangelo Marinaro, I'm the writer of MikeJer's Buffy Reviews, and am the creator and developer of the entire CriticallyTouched.com network.

My long-term career goal is to become an innovator in the area of game development. By innovator, I mean I want to change the fundamental way games are played. I'm interested in tapping games for their full artistic and entertainment values, not unlike what Joss Whedon has done with television. Most games don't even bother thinking about the story or having developing, likeable characters, and the rare few that do stop short of going all the way. I'm thrilled at the thought of changing that by helping to design and develop my own games. It's safe to say that I have a genuine passion for doing this. The way I see it, it's only a matter of time before I'm in place to realise this dream. :)

I occasionally love writing articles, essays, and papers about things that interest me, and Buffy the Vampire Slayer is the best television show I've ever seen. In case you're wondering, my other favorite shows include, in no particular order: Firefly, Seinfeld, Angel, Freaks and Geeks, Star Trek: TNG, and Star Trek: DS9. New shows I'm watching regularly are Dexter, Friday Night Lights, How I Met Your Mother, The Big Bang Theory, Chuck, and True Blood. A sampling of my favorite movies includes Donnie Darko, Lost in Translation, Serenity, Memento, LotR: Fellowship of the Ring, Shaun of the Dead, The Ring, Pulp Fiction, and Pan's Labyrinth.

If you live in the Seattle area and want to hang out, just e-mail me and we'll work out the details. Also, to the none of you girls interested, I am currently and very often (okay, always) single. ;)



- About CriticallyTouched.com

Originally hosted over at SuperJer.com, Mikelangelo "MikeJer" Marinaro moved out on his own to create, develop, administer, and launch the review network CriticallyTouched.com in mid-2009. This site is part of a larger network of review/analysis sites for quality television shows and other media. Each reviewer goes through a thorough interview process in which they are screened for insight, skill, sanity, and overall intelligence. If you have any problems with the reviewer of this site or the functionality/design of the site itself, please feel free to e-mail Mike at mikejer(at)gmail(dot)com. We hope you enjoy all the time, effort, sweat, and tears put into the development, design, and content of this network.



- Grading
While I hate the idea of putting 'grades' to percentages, if you feel you need something to gauge my scoring by, here is how I would break down the grade levels:
PThis episode was awarded the Platinum Badge! This represents a 'special' episode that perfectly captures the essence of CriticallyTouched's view of television at its best by having superb intelligence, emotion, and a pivotal lasting impact to the characters and/or series at large.
A95 - 99 A sharply written episode consisting of zero major mistakes. Usually develops characters in a meaningful manner and is a joy to watch on repeat viewings. Near perfect, but not quite there.
A-90 - 94 Everything that an 'A' possesses, but with either a few more mistakes or slightly less power. Generally represents great episodes that are a tiny bit rough around the edges.
B+85 - 89 Just misses the mark of excellence. Essentially, a great episode that's rough around the edges and/or slightly flawed. Extremely fun to watch.
B80 - 84 A bit flawed, but otherwise very good. There's a lot of intelligence, character relevance, and/or fun here, but a few nagging problems keep it from rising higher.
B-75 - 79 Flawed in some areas. Possibly lacking in character development and relevance or possessing a poor plot and/or villain. There's still a lot of good material mixed in with the mediocre.
C+70 - 74 The main plot is likely problematic and/or hokey, but sharp humor and/or character development and relevance keep it afloat. A couple moments may be over-the-top in a bad way.
C65 - 69 Noticeably flawed. The main plot is likely poor and/or hokey, but some chunks of character development and relevance make it worth watching.
C-60 - 64 Very flawed. Either the main plot is completely insulting or there's some out-of-characterness going on. Avoids falling into uselessness by way of some good character development and/or insight.
D+55 - 59 Just too flawed to quite recommend. There might be a few entertaining moments, but they're completely outweighed by a likely awful plot and slight-to-no character significance.
D50 - 54 Silly, useless plot. Poor execution of intended (if any) themes. No new important character development or insight. Offers no reason to bother rewatching it.
D-45 - 49 Everything that a 'D' is only slightly worse. One or two character moments, some humor, or slight nuggets of relevance just barely keep it from outright failing.
F0 - 44 Just plain awful. Completely failed at what it was trying to do. Might be painful to watch. The only points awarded are for tiny bits of humor and/or a character moment or two.

Note: Anything greater than or equal to a C- I consider having some positive qualities -- usually quality character moments and/or development -- and is worth watching.
<<News
Copyright © 2010 CriticallyTouched.com, Mikelangelo Marinaro (e-mail me at: mikejer(at)criticallytouched(dot)com). All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any review or article on this site is prohibited. All works and related characters are property of Joss Whedon, Mutant Enemy, 20th Century FOX, Universal Studios, Dark Horse Comics, and IDW Comics. I have no affiliation with Joss Whedon or any of those companies.