STYLES: STANDARD  |  PRINT NAVIGATE: CRITICALLYTOUCHED.COM Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Get the news with RSS!
MikeJer's Buffy Reviews
homereviewsarticleslinksdiscussion
<<Home
The Harvest>>

THE LONG WAY HOME PT. 3 (8x03)
<<Season 7 Review
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
A review by Mikelangelo "MikeJer" Marinaro,
July 2, 2007

Writer: Joss Whedon
Artist: Georges Jeanty

- Quick Links


WARNING: This is a retrospective review and may contain SPOILERS. Read at your own discretion.

- Review

Contrary to popular opinion, I feel that "The Long Way Home Pt. 3" is the worst issue so far. While not awful by any stretch, there are certain things that confuse me, certain things that bug me, and certain things that deeply worry me. When reading comments online I simply hear that many love the comics just because the Scoobies are finally working closely together again. My response is "really? Is that the only reason?" I find myself wondering now more than ever what it is that people want out of these comics and what they wanted out of the main series. Apparently their wants are a whole lot more simplistic than mine are. I'll leave whether that's a good thing or a bad thing for another day. So, lets jump right into the problems!

Problem #1: Ethan Rayne. Ok, Ethan making an appearance in of himself doesn't bug me all that much. But when you've got Ethan, Warren, and Amy all within the same issue, one (namely being me) starts thinking "fan service." An overload of old characters appearing at once just doesn't feel like a realistic continuation of the series -- it feels like subpar fan fiction. If Whedon's idea of carrying on the show 'without restraints' is a ton of fan wank, fan service, and over-the-top situations (even by Buffy standards), then plop me down in the "I don't like it one bit" column. Sometimes showing restraint and taking the "less is more" approach works wonders.

Problem #2: the confusing narrative. While reading this issue, I just get no solid feeling of pace and grounding. Drastically different things are intercutting with each other so quickly that I'm not sure whether to blame Whedon, the comic book format, or maybe both. A good example of this is the fight between Willow and Amy. It just feels completely impersonal and underdeveloped. We see Willow exchange a few words with Amy, apparently absorb her magic, blast away looking ridiculous, and cast a spell on the demon army. But... it turns out she didn't take Amy's magic... and then we're back in Buffy's 'dreamspace'... and then we're back watching Willow get all pixelized, which I gets translates to going black now... and then Dawn squishes Amy with her foot but doesn't because Willow traps her in a mystical holding box of some kind? Color me confused. Too much jumping around and with the comic book format I just can't buy or follow what's going on.

Problem #3: wonky characterization in villainry. General Voll's been completely lame (although he doesn't make an appearance in this issue) and Amy's unfortunately still a one-dimensional meaningless villain, carried over from "The Killer in Me" (7x13). In every panel Amy's in she has this incredibly goofy 'evil villain' smile on her face. It doesn't help that the artist's rendering of her doesn't look like Amy at all. This problem with the villains extends in a big, but very different, way with the huge reveal of Warren at the end of the issue.

Problem #4: Warren. I can't count how many ways this is an awful revelation. Unless this is the ghost of Warren or some illusion I'll be pretty pissed. The worst thing this means is that Amy resurrected Warren somehow, which honestly completely ruins one of the things I respected most about the Buffyverse: it's take on resurrection. That 'take' is that you simply cannot resurrect people who died a natural death. Warren died from skin loss and was then scorched by Willow. There's no coming back from that. If Warren's resurrected, then get prepared for the possibility of every character that died on Buffy to be resurrected! If that's a notion that makes you rejoice, then I think you're reading reviews from the wrong guy. The comment about Kennedy also made me sick. Whedon's treating the fact that Willow resurrected Kennedy from a mystical death in an extremely flippant way. And Buffy doesn't even call her on it (Season 6 people)! Not cool.

Whatever jargon Whedon uses to explain this, if Warren is indeed alive, it still negates the relevance and lasting power of everything Willow did at the end of S6 (killing a human) and the subsequent time spent dealing with it in S7. Plus, the First appeared as Warren in "Conversations with Dead People" (7x07), which means he was, unequivocally, dead. Is Whedon trying to ruin rewatches of the series or something? Are we soon going to find out that Tara didn't really die, or that when Angelus snapped Jenny Calendar's neck it was really just a magically created double? What's next? Frankly, I'm already tired of it. If Whedon brings back another dead character, he's really going to lose me.

I've also got to say I'm not terribly happy with what we've seen out of Giles so far. I've got no clue what he's doing. Maybe that's the point, but I'd rather people talk about him vaguely than seeing him doing these weird things that are never explained. I don't mind a little ambiguity in plot, but if it goes on too long the film will lose me. But enough of all my negativity. For all the problems readily apparent in this issue there are also some positive qualities.

The panel that takes the cake is Buffy dreaming about being smooshed in between a nude Angel and Spike, although I must admit I have a hard time seeing Buffy dreaming herself dressed up as a nurse in a sexual fantasy. Doesn't really seem like her style. However, this panel is hilarious, ridiculous, and nurse-aside utterly believable. The imagery on the side is equally hilarious: stakes in roses and trains going into holes of an erupting volcano. I also greatly appreciated the 'cube' panel which, of course, has all kinds of throwbacks to the series along with a picture of Whedon himself thrown in there for good measure. Very cool!

Some of the dream imagery coming out of Buffy is fairly intriguing as well. You've got Amy's cage, a dead pig man, and the three X's. I'll be honest and say that I'm not the best when it comes to speculation, so I'll leave that for others. But I've certainly heard some interesting theories on what all of it means. Really, though, I think the page that best captures what I wanted more of out of this issue is when Xander consoles Renee about getting stabbed. Now there's good, solid, character interaction of the variety that's sorely missing in this mostly-action outing.

Overall I feel the best comparison to this issue is "Primeval" (4x21), an episode that was very light on taking the time for solid characterization and very much focused on the 'big battle.' Issue #2 succeeded so much in my mind because of its heavy focus on the characters. Its dialogue was believably funny, while here it feels fairly forced. Essentially, Warren's back, and I'm not happy about it. While I still enjoyed this issue to an extent, I obviously have serious problems with some of the things Whedon is doing.



- Minor Pros/Cons (+/-)
Pros:
+  
Dawn faux-squishing Amy with her giant foot. Although I think Whedon's a bit overly infatuated with Giant Dawn. It's just not that funny.
+  
Andrew's apparent boredom at being stuck with a bunch of girls taking their clothes off.
+  
The look on Buffy's face when she says "We're being played, Xander. I'm not liking it."
  
Cons:
-  
Willow's big battle with Amy just didn't come alive for me at all. Amy's dumb evil smile really isn't helping me care very much either.
-  
I'm kind of annoyed that we didn't find out who kissed Buffy. These comics come out once every month, Whedon's got to give us more answers in each issue.


- Quotes
XANDER:  
Ladies and other ladies... the indescribable Rosenberg.

XANDER:  
Say it with me now
DAWN:  
F%$#CKING FUM.

BUFFY:  
So what are you doing in there?
ETHAN:  
Where am I?
BUFFY:  
Cage crossbeams, like X's. So this all, what, means something? Three X's. Triple X. So it's either Vin Diesel or porn, neither of which is real attractive.

WILLOW:  
Serious magic is kinda like improv, Dawn. You can't just stop it cold; you gotta adapt.
DAWN:  
Is that why I've got an army of the undead playing Pride and Prejudice around my ankles?

BUFFY:  
I have a funny feeling on my mouth. Cinnamon buns!

XANDER:  
Wanted to make sure you're not seeing any action.
ANDREW:  
I wish! We're just trying to think of games to stay awake. It's Dullsville, Italy.
XANDER:  
Sounds good enough to me.
ANDREW:  
No, trust me... you'd be bored stiff.

XANDER:  
(To Renee) Well this is really unimpressive. One attack by the undead and Renee has to take a nap, "Oh I'm all run through with a broadsword, I have to lie around and heal..." Back in my day, which was about a week and half ago, we took our lumps and we got back up and we cried like babies and quit and then put on weight.

XANDER:  
Wait! What? A funny? There's funny bonhomie happening and I want in!
BUFFY:  
No.. ahh... ahh.. girl thing.
XANDER:  
Girl thing? With girl parts? Now I really need to know!


- Score Learn about the Grading Scale
70/100 C+
The main plot is likely problematic and/or hokey, but sharp humor and/or character development and relevance keep it afloat. A couple moments may be over-the-top in a bad way.


- Screencaps
<<Home
The Harvest>>

<<Season 7 Review
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

- Comments (18) View Today's Comments | Subscribe:

1.MezJul 2, 2007 (Mon)View This Person's Comments | Link
Okay. Gotta say, I don't think Willow's comments about Kennedy meant that Willow RESURRECTED her after she died.

I agree with a lot of your other comments, though...

2.junJul 2, 2007 (Mon)View This Person's Comments | Link
I didn't think so either, Mez, but boy howdy, do I agree about Warren. I am going to have to try hard to forget this stuff when I rewatch S6/S7.

I can forgive it, I guess, but if he does it again, I am going to be forced to decide whether to continue the series or not.

3.rickJul 2, 2007 (Mon)View This Person's Comments | Link
....I'm starting to wish the series was never ressurrected. I hate to have to say that. I hate to say even more that I'm dreading the release of Angel s6.

4.MikeJerJul 2, 2007 (Mon)View This Person's Comments | Link
I think that it's extremely premature to make a statement like that Rick. I do agree with you that, so far, these comics have added very little good to the continuity of the series (the news about the Buffy doubles being #1 on the small list). With that said, I'm still willing to give this 'season' some time to develop itself into something worthwhile. I encourage everyone who's having some doubts to do the same.

5.KimJul 3, 2007 (Tue)View This Person's Comments | Link
I think the major issue here really biols down to format. I think there are explinations in Joss' head for all of the concerns you have, but the time it takes to reveal them is killing the mood. It seems like these things need to either be longer or just jump into book form in order to be more meaningful. Since neither is going to happen, I'm going to wait patiently for more like a good fangirl.

6.rickJul 3, 2007 (Tue)View This Person's Comments | Link
Oh I shall wait. I'm too loyal a fan to abandon the series here and now, but I must admit that I wish the series hadn't been brought back, assuming this is how the issues are going to be.

7.robgnowJul 3, 2007 (Tue)View This Person's Comments | Link
I have the issue with Willow and Xander putting together the 'Buffy-puzzle' on the cover. My first thought was that we were going to have a 'time out' issue to explore Buffy's psychology. We got glimpses in the dream sequence, but I kinda wanted more. I'd have been happy to have character insight over magical battles, but its nice to see Willow.

I laughed out loud during that "he called me my love". Did anyone else immediately think 'Spike'. And then "And then I threw up in my mouth a little". lol

I agree with Mike about the dream images of Spike and Angel having a Buffy sandwich. And the train in the tunnel... the erupting volcano... yeah.

I disagree about Amy. Since they already destroyed her character in S-7, anyway with that bizarre revenge spell, I'd say she was pretty much in character. Too bad, 'cause I would have liked Amy to be redeemed instead of the direction they took with her. I do like Willow and her interaction though. Especially on pages 5 & 6.

I'm very disappointed in bringing back Warren. What was the point of that? And why mess with continuity of S-7 that way?? I'm sorry, but he had to be dead, that's all there is too it. And I just don't buy that Amy was ever powerful enough to do the resurrection spell (although that would explain Warren's current skinlessness).

So... problems definitely, but I'd bump the grade to B-.

8.MikeJerJul 3, 2007 (Tue)View This Person's Comments | Link
robgnow, by "wonky characterization" I didn't intend to mean that Amy (or anyone for that matter) was acting out of character, but rather that none of the villains so far have any interesting characteristics. Maybe "uninteresting characteristics" would have been a bit clearer.

I stand by my grade though. I had troubles getting much enjoyment out of this one.

9.BarbaraJul 7, 2007 (Sat)View This Person's Comments | Link
I haven't actually read the comic book issues, but I've been reading your reviews to keep up with what has been happening. I don't believe Warren being resurrected was a good idea, unless, like you said, he's a ghost or an illusion.

But I would like to say that the first took on Buffy's appearence as well and she wasn't dead at the time, so Warren didn't have to be dead at the time either. I don't see how he would be alive, but he could be ressurected because if you think about it, the way he died wasn't natural at all.

Tara died by a gun shot wound, which is a bad way to die, but it happens all the time. It's natural...man made. Warren died from witchcraft, which is of the supernatural. He could be ressurected and it wouldn't really mess up the laws made up in season six or whichever one it was.

10.MikeJerJul 7, 2007 (Sat)View This Person's Comments | Link
Babara, the First can only assume the form of people who have died (that doesn't mean they have to be currently dead). This means that Warren did die in "Villains." That's all I was getting at.

Additionally, although witchcraft was the means of physical force used to flay him, Warren did not die of supernatural causes. He died of skin loss. Just because witchcraft was used doesn't mean he didn't die by human means. Real humans can die of severe skin loss. Real humans can't die inside a mystical portal. In "The Gift" we only know that she died inside the mystical energy of the portal. See the difference? :)

11.chrisJul 12, 2007 (Thu)View This Person's Comments | Link
I do think you're quite a bit [b]too[/b] negativ in your review - two thirds of it sound like quite a rant. On the other hand, I do think your rating itself is very reasonable.

First of all, somehow I don't see your problems #1 and #2.

As for problem #1, well, the cliffhangers of issues #1 and #2 (now the numbering gets confusing ;-)) were actually "Who is Amy's boyfriend?" and "Who is that guy in Buffy's dream?" - and so I don't think you can call the resolution to those cliffhangers "fan service". Perhaps it's because I actually hoped it [b]wasn't[/b] Warren and never cared that much about Ethan (don't get me wrong: he's a great character, and I loved his appearances in the series - it's just that I'm not really intrigued by him as much as others are) that I don't feel very "serviced" by those two appearing in the comics.

As for problem #2 (confusing narrative): While I still feel that I have to get accustomed to reading comic books myself, from my perception, there wasn't much of a difference between issues #1, #2 and #3 - I didn't find #3 particularly confusing (compared to #1 and #2). But that's only my perception.

Regarding the rest:

I completely agree with your points regarding Giles - his story line has been quite confusing. On the other hand, the cover text of issue #6 promisses that he'll play an integral role in that issue so I'm hopeful we're going to see more of him then.

As I already pointed out in your discussion board, I agree that if Willow actually resurrected Kennedy, I'd be very upset. The only problem I have with your review is that you take for granted that she actually did it - but her comments are a bit ambiguous. I agree that we don't know enough about the mythology of the Buffyverse in order to actually think of another way to have Kennedy resurrected, so Willow being the responsible party is the only guess we can make right now. But my point is that just because we can't think of another way doesn't mean that there isn't any. I'd rather want to wait and see - perhaps there's an explanation that's in-character yet not contrived.

As for Buffy calling Willow out due to her comments: Remember Selfless? Buffy didn't call Xander out as he suggested Willow could resurrect Anya's victims [Oh, by the way: Xander stated they were mystical deaths even though only the creature itself was brought to Sunnydale mystically - the actual death was caused by the creature ripping out the hearts of the victims - so in my eyes there still is a chance that Warren's death could be regarded as mystical within the mythology of the Buffyverse. On the other hand, Xander could just have said that grasping at straws.]. Buffy didn't say anything in response to that. And Willow said "I don't have anywhere near that kind of power. I didn't have that kind of power when [...]". She didn't say "we shouldn't do it", she said she couldn't! And Buffy didn't comment on that either. And later on Anya has D'Hoffryn reverse the spell she did - thus resurrecting the victims - nobody mentions any S6-like repercussions for the victims at that point either. So while I agree that I currently can't immagine that Willow actually resurrected Kennedy and I really hope that Whedon will come up with a *much* better explanation, I don't object to the fact that Buffy didn't say anything at that point even if Willow should have done it (which doesn't necessarily mean Buffy wouldn't do that at a later time with less stuff going on around her).

Finally, reading [i]Frankly, I'm already tired of it. If Whedon brings back another dead character, he's really going to lose me.[/i]: Please, this is far below the usual (high) standard of your reviews. Give the comics a chance, wait at least until the first 3 oder 4 arcs have been released before you decide if the comics really suck.

[Oh, just a technical sidenote - a preview function for the comments would be nice.]

12.MikeJerJul 12, 2007 (Thu)View This Person's Comments | Link
Chris, all very good points.

Re #1: I meant "fan service" in a more generic sense. Generally in fan fiction you see an overload of old characters appearing at the same time. It feels unrealistic and cheap to me.

Re #2: this issue (obviously) just didn't connect with me. It was also a huge disappointment after the strong second issue. In light of this perhaps my review itself was a bit harsh.

The score reflects my overall feeling of the issue even though it does seem as though most of the review dwelled in the negative. I guess I just had a lot of frustrations to let out, which happens now and then.

I can see your point about Kennedy, but as you surmised it's not a crazy assumption that it 'reads' as if Willow did, in fact, resurrect Kennedy. The reason I make such a big deal about this in particular is because Kennedy is a (like it or not) major figure in Willow's life. Using the "Selfless" example, the frat boys are not.

When it comes to resurrection, I agree that "Selfless" makes it a bit confusing. The way I've always looked at it, though, is that vengeance demon spells seem to have a side effect of altering reality. Remember "The Wish?" Cordelia didn't stay dead from that encounter either because the vengeance spell was broken. Everything surrounding vengeance spells seems extremely mystical to me. This was evident right from the get-go when Anya first appeared in the series. There's been no evidence at all, however, to lead us to believe that Willow's magic does anything of the sort.

So, this is all clearly not as solid as I'd like, but as long as I'm still able to reasonably logic my way through based on the rules set throughout the series, I'm generally able to go with the flow (as long as that flow actually turns out to be valuable). As of now, I not only don't buy Warren being alive again, but I also hate it from a character development standpoint. It also completely ruins rewatches of S6. So at this point I simply don't believe it happened, because it's a continuity hole and I chose to believe the series over the comics in the event of a conflict.

In regard to giving the comics a chance... "have you heard my speeches?" Just read comment 4 of this review. I am willing to give the comics some time before making any solid judgements about its quality. However, Whedon really will begin to lose me if he brings back yet another relevant dead character in a way that unambigiously breaks established Buffyverse law.

[Now, a couple technical sidenotes for myself! First of all, a preview function is a great idea. I'll consider doing that next time I jump in for a code update. Secondly, I notice that you're not entering in your tags correctly. This input takes HTML, not BBS tags. So instead of using '[' and ']' you have to use '<' and '>'.]

Thanks for the comments! Some very good points.

13.hostile17Aug 19, 2007 (Sun)View This Person's Comments | Link
And here I thought I was the only one with strong feelings about S8. Overall, while I concede some of your points, am enjoying season 8 quite a bit.
Here's a review of the latest issue if you or your readers would care to look at it.
Cheers!

14.hostile17Aug 19, 2007 (Sun)View This Person's Comments | Link
oops. Forgot to give you the link. Here it is: http://www.journalismdude.blog.com

15.Dana5140Aug 19, 2007 (Sun)View This Person's Comments | Link
Oops- over on TLWH4 I commented on the horrid retcon of Warren showing up. Let me comment here on Kennedy- there has to be a significant reason that we have not yet seen her, we have been led to believe that she died (yes, the Tara fans rejoice), and then she was brought back (and the Tara fans get depressed again), and that there is strife between her and Willow (And the Tara fans get happy again). This is all leading to something, for sure. Given that a good percentage of readers have turned in to see if Tara is going to come back, this is playing with them- and Joss knows it. My take- wait another 20 issues or so, and she is. YMMV, and I don't want to ignite a yes-no on the issue. I stand firmly yes, but that's me. :-)

16.misskittyfantasticoNov 3, 2007 (Sat)View This Person's Comments | Link
I personally loved tara but i think that she should not be brought back, but some nod to he might be nice in the series. Maybe a standalone flashback issue talking about tara before she came to sunnydale would be nice. I always thought that her past wasn't as fleshed out as it could be and that might make the tata fans happy for a while.

17.misskittyfantasticoNov 3, 2007 (Sat)View This Person's Comments | Link
i mean tara fans oops

18.fray-adjacentAug 27, 2010 (Fri) @ 2:26amView This Person's Comments | Link
Although I've stayed caught up on the comics, the resurrection of Warren Meers has kept me from ever really seeing them as canon. I just simply refuse to believe that he's alive.


- Post a Comment
Name

(NOTE: Before posting your opinion on this episode, please remember to read the review, be respectful of opposing opinions, and to competently use at least basic spelling and grammar. The administrator has the right to remove a comment at any time.)
(*** copy your comment in case of failure!!! ***)

Security Code
Security Code

  

Copyright © 2012 CriticallyTouched.com, Mikelangelo Marinaro (e-mail me at: mikejer(at)criticallytouched(dot)com). All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any review or article on this site is prohibited. All works and related characters are property of Joss Whedon, Mutant Enemy, 20th Century FOX, Universal Studios, Dark Horse Comics, and IDW Comics. I have no affiliation with Joss Whedon or any of those companies.