| [LIGHT | DARK] | NAVIGATE: ⇩ CRITICALLYTOUCHED.COM |
|
| home | reviews | articles | links | discussion |
| Writer: | Steven S. DeKnight |
| Director: | Terence O'Hara |
| - | Quick Links |
| - | Review |
“Deep Down” is an episode relentless in its portrayal of a landscape made bleak by the absence of its hero. For all the flaws of the season three finale "Tomorrow" (3x22), the situation it promised our protagonists was rife with intriguing darkness. Season four’s premiere is testament to AtS being the kind of show that keeps its promises. Things have gone to hell at Angel Investigations; Gunn and Fred are completely in the dark, stretching themselves thin as they struggle to uphold the business while searching for Angel. Wesley has been firmly cleaved from the group and seems intent upon embracing that separation. Meanwhile Connor is holding the hand-basket that took them all there. Not that anyone would know it, of course; seemingly guiltless, he soaks in Fred and Gunn’s affections even as he deceives them.
This is an episode loaded with riveting moral conflicts. How do you move on from a devastating loss when you have nothing left but pain? And say the need to forgive and forget is so overwhelming that you manage to do so. What then? Where do you go from there? And how do you live with forgiving someone who has betrayed you, especially when they might do so again? While AtS has never been the kind of show to shy away from dark questions, never before have all the answers seemed like devils bargains. Never before have the wrong people seemed so right. See how Justine talks sense to Wes. Watch how Lilah cuts through the bullshit (figuratively and literally!). The whole episode is such an uncompromising display of how people can fail in the face of their own suffering that it never fails to stun me anew.
It’s a welcome return to form from season three, which favoured emotion-laden gut-punches over the more philosophically agile kind of storytelling that propelled seasons one and two. “Deep Down” is just a taste of season four’s labyrinthine complexity. If its sprawling, season-long plotline fails in places, it fails only due to over-extension; the entire season is one big gamble that attempts to pay-off everything that came before it. And I mean everything. Darla, Connor, Cordelia, fate, destiny, the prophecies and the Powers That Be. All of it. Everything.
I don’t know how specifically the writers devised the overarching framework of the show, but their attempt to bring everything full circle is as impressive in its ambition as it is provocative in its insistence upon challenging the audience with its conclusions. If you think we actually have free will, for instance, watch, and think again.
What makes “Deep Down” so compelling is the sheer head-crushing depth of the moral conflicts it presents. There are few things more relevant to the human experience than the question of what the “right thing” is for any given situation. Stories about morality, well executed, tap the deepest wells of emotion and sometimes, with a bit of luck, the brainiest ideas about what “the right thing” even means. When the wrong thing starts to seem right for a character on a show as smart as this you just know you’re in for some shenanigans.
We open on Fred and Gunn in the first act. To say they’re outmatched by their problems would win you an award for understatement. Not only are leads on Angel and Cordy coming up short, but Gunn and Fred fallen inadvertently into the role of Connor’s surrogate parents. Raising a teenager is tough enough when he isn’t the offspring of two vampires and the hidden source of all your misery. Never mind the bills and the lack of paying clients; being able to take care of those issues would be a luxury now. Fred and Gunn struggle just to run on empty, and their frustration is palpable.
Then there’s Connor. One of the more interesting choices the writers made in contriving the post-Angel landscape for this episode was in not sending him off on his own, but making him part of a new family unit with Fred and Gunn. His decision to shack up with them after betraying Angel provides insight into just what an ordinary teenager he really is, despite his inter-dimensional baggage and cosmic destiny. He needs to fill the hole left by Holtz’s death, and he needs boundaries to test, and a stable household to come home to. But like any other kid, his boundary testing always comes at the expense of his guardians, and this adds to the weight on Fred and Gunn’s shoulders.
When you think about the whole series up to this point, everyone on this show has suffered some pretty awful stuff over the years. The grand point, it seems, is that the world is harsh and cruel, and it turns all of us to dark thoughts at one time or another. The variable between us is the way we deal with this fact.
Fred deals it with it rather poorly. When she finds out what Connor did to Angel, she turns to deceit and violence almost unnervingly fast. It’s not just about neutralizing Connor as a threat either; she’s so consumed by rage that she tazes him again after he’s been tied up. “All these months,” she gasps, horrified, “you knew.” She wants to hurt him for that. Gunn relishes Angel’s coming return: “That’s right, sparky. Daddy’s coming home, and I’m guessing there’s gonna be a whooping.” Even if we agree with the general sentiment here (and I’m guessing a large majority of the AtS audience, which hates Connor, does), we have to stop and look at the impulse. It’s violent, and it’s ugly.
When Angel forgives Connor, it’s a reminder of why he’s the “champion.” Throughout the series Angel probably experiences more pain most other characters in the Whedonverse put together. He lost Buffy, spent eternity in hell, lost her again, moved to LA, started a new life, and lost again: Doyle, Darla, Connor, Cordelia. Here’s a guy for whom living must be a daily chore, and yet he soldiers on. His ultimate realization is that the world is harsh and irredeemably cruel no matter what he does; the value of champions then, is in setting an example for others by embodying the mere possibility of a better world. He forgives Connor merely to live up to that example, even in spite of the violent impulses deep inside of him.
But there are limits to his moral triumph. The fact that he could even consider killing his son is a disturbing turn for him. What I find most revealing about the way he confronted Connor at the end is that he put the point of no return squarely before Cordelia, rather than some principle or general course of action. Had Connor admitted wrong-doing towards her, I have no doubt Angel would have killed him.
This got me thinking about what I said about Angel in my review of "Lullaby" [3x09]. He came to realize that redemption was ultimately unattainable, following from his earlier realization in "Epiphany" [2x16] that working towards too big an objective was a recipe for failure. He’s been a day-to-day, means-over-ends kind of guy ever since. Seems like a good way to live, but at the same time that very transformation laid the foundations for a backslide that begins right here.
Without faith in the attainability of redemption, and failing to see any finite end to his immortal life of suffering, Angel has started shrinking into a defensive position where his primary concern is the welfare of his family at Angel Investigations. Season four features a slow erosion of Angel’s will to help the helpless in the grand scheme of things, and his conflict in this episode between doing the right thing and giving into his own impulses – with his impulses very nearly winning – casts the shadow that shapes his deal with Wolfram and Hart in the season finale "Home" [4x22].
Throughout “Deep Down” our heroes are smacked with difficult truths about the ugliness and brutality of the world, and the choice must fall to them to accept the world and run with the cruelty it inspires, or reject it and strive for something better. The theme of choice is a dividing line that runs right down the episode. On the one side you have Angel, who takes the high road by rejecting the world-as-it-is, even if he acknowledges its influence over his actions. Yes, the world is cruel, but it need not be. We need only live as though the world were better than it is. It may be a self-imposed delusion on Angel’s part, but when the truth does nothing but hurt, is it worth its weight as a principle?
On the other side of the line you have Wesley, who accepts the cruelty and brutality of the world. He’s become the perfect anti-Angel in that regard. He’s an ends-over-means kinda guy, which means he does whatever it takes to get the job done. He still fights demons, and he spends the entirety of the episode fighting to rescue Angel, but at the end of the day he holds to philosophical and moral differences that set him starkly apart from his old friends. What he lacks now is the delusional thinking that made him play the hero to such disastrous results. The rock-bottom he hit in late season three was such an overwhelming wake up call that it forced him to make a choice: he could either let pain overrun his life, or he could simply accept himself, warts and all.
Justine’s taunts wound him, but only superficially. He knows she’s right; the pain of his failure and loss of love from his friends still causes him daily anguish. But at the same time he has simply and unspectacularly come to terms with who he is. Note his body language: he has the measured walk and hundred-yard-stare of a man whose mind is peaceful with certainty. Alexis Denisof’s subtle tweaking of the way he plays Wesley produces a believable result. This is a changed man.
You have to feel sorry for Justine, who certainly hasn’t changed. It seems that in life that there are some people who are more comfortable being told what to do by somebody else, and she’s one of them. Now that it’s Wes telling her what to do she has yet another convenient target for her rage. His weird enslavement of her also says something about his blooming capacity for doing whatever a mission requires (such as going all the way with Lilah while Justine listens from her cage in the closet. Creepy, or…creepy?). But in a moment of twisted kinship, he offers Justine her freedom and some insight: “You can continue to be a slave, or you can life your life. Your choice.”
If there’s one thing that diminishes my enjoyment of “Deep Down” it’s that the episodes following it pale in comparison. The season is too quick to re-establish the show’s old dynamic and restore a sense of normalcy. Why stop piling on the layers of deceit and intrigue when you could thoroughly explore each one of them? I could see at least four or five episodes coming out of an Angel-less AtS. But I suppose David Boreanaz had a contract. And a lawyer.
| - | Minor Pros/Cons (+/-) |
| Pros: | |
| + | Lorne’s consistency in bashing his family: “so long as it’s not my mother!” |
| + | Fred with wrist-mounted stakes! These are just awesome on anyone, but on the lovely Amy Acker? Very yes. |
| + | + Lilah and Gavin still totally hating each other. |
| + | Wesley pulling the knife on Justine: “Oh, screw you!” |
| + | Linwood finally doing something useful by dying. |
| Cons: | |
| - | Wesley and Justine’s “banter” during their first scene together on the boat. This is some seriously bad exposition. I understand the need to get lapsed viewers up to speed on complex events they might have missed, but having characters spit out a re-cap like they’re reading a script is not good writing, writers! Bad writers! |
| - | Spanish stereotyping. I see it extends even to vampires now! “Esse,” “homie,” “hermano.” Come on. Most major TV is made in LA, which is chalk-full of Mexican immigrants and other Spanish-speakers. You would think the writers would know a few who weren’t complete caricatures. |
| - | Foreshadowing |
|
| - | Quotes |
| FRED: | Marissa, stop! We just wanna talk |
| MARISSA: | I don’t know anything! |
| GUNN: | You psychic? |
| MARISSA: | No. |
| GUNN: | Then shut up and let us ask the question first! |
| GUNN: | (about Connor) Offspring of two vampires. Last time I checked that's not supposed to happen. And - jumping off a six-story without busting your coconut kind of sways me to the side of not just a boy. I mean, come on, Fred. His nickname back in Quortoth was the destroyer. And unless you put Conan in front of that, I'm guessing it's not a good sign. |
| GUNN: | (about Lorne) Did he have anything? |
| FRED: | No. And who’s ‘fluffy?’ (curious) Are you fluffy? |
| GUNN: | He called me fluffy? |
| FRED: | He said make sure... Wait. You don't - think he was referring to anything of mine that's fluffy, do you? (disgusted) Because that would just be inappropriate. |
| LINWOOD: | Lilah, this is my corner of the sky. I decide when the sun rises and when it sets. Lack of long-term vision has always been one of your shortcomings |
| LILAH: | (stands up, holding a palm-pilot and pen for it) And lack of courage has always been one of yours. You're afraid - of Angel and his son. And that's the reason for your daring strategy of 'wait and see', isn't it? You're afraid. And fear breeds weakness. |
| LINWOOD: | (indifferent) Oh, I’m Hurt. Is that really what you think of me. |
| LILAH: | Yes. And Mr. Suvarta agrees with me. |
| LINWOOD: | (snaps up) You spoke to a Senior Partner? |
| LILAH: | He was really very helpful. He had some great hints on office furniture. |
| LINWOOD: | This is outrageous! Are you actually telling me that you went over my head?! |
| LILAH: | (she clicks her palm pilot. a blade emerges from Linwood’s chair and slices his head off). Just under it, actually. |
| ANGEL: | What you did to me - was unbelievable, Connor. - But then I got stuck in a hell dimension by my girlfriend one time for a hundred years, so three months under the ocean actually gave me perspective. Kind of an M. C. Escher perspective - but I did get time to think. About us, about the world. - Nothing in the world is the way it ought to be. - It's harsh, and cruel. - But that's why there's us. Champions. It doesn't matter where we come from, what we've done or suffered, or even if we make a difference. We live as though the world was what it should be, to show it what it can be. - You're not a part of that yet. - I hope you will be. (Angel moves to stand in front of Connor) I love you, Connor. (Quietly, after a beat) Now get out of my house. |
| - | Score | Learn about the Grading Scale |
| 95/100 |
A ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ |
A sharply written episode consisting of zero major mistakes. Usually develops characters in a meaningful manner and is a joy to watch on repeat viewings. Near perfect, but not quite there.
|
| - | Awards |
|
| - | Screencaps |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| - |
Comments (16)
|
| 1. | RickMay 19, 2009 (Tue)Link | |
| I do not have to not say that I don't completely disagree with almost everything you didn't not say. |
| 2. | buffyholicMay 20, 2009 (Wed)Link | |
| Ryan, welcome back! And I applaud your decision to start S4 again, this review is excellent. I just wanna say that this episode totally caught me by surprise as well as this whole season. I love this season because it takes risks, it´s dark and completely riveting. Though flawed, I still think this is so much greater than S3. Again, excellent review and can´t wait for your next one. |
| 3. | ArouetMay 23, 2009 (Sat)Link | |
| I preferred your more optimistic analysis of this episode the first time you reviewed it, but I will admit this is very good. You don't seem to place much weight on "We live as though the world were as it should be, to show it what it can be" anymore. Now you seem to think of it as just a little cry in the vast darkness now, and not the passionate, powerful defiance that I thought it was, and you believed it was, when you wrote your first review. |
| 4. | ArouetMay 23, 2009 (Sat)Link | |
| And while you have to give them points for bravery in the way that they spun everything that had happened before this season together, I think it was detrimental to the overall story. It cheapens Darla's sacrifice and Holtz's tragedy by arguing that it wasn't really their choice. And for all the reckless bravery of the writers during this season the way they botched Orpheus and the Angelus arc in general remains inexcusable, and possibly cowardly. |
| 5. | RickMay 24, 2009 (Sun)Link | |
| I am in agreement that the Angelus arc is indeed cowardly, and most definitely the biggest flaw of the entire series. The fact that the entire notion of ambiguity and self-accountability so central to the series was thrown out to support a plot threat that really didn't matter is really quite insulting. I am of course referring to Angelus being distinct from Angel so that we can posit each as having a separate memory. Sigh. Terrible writing. Reminds me of Heroes, actually. |
| 6. | DarthMarionMay 25, 2009 (Mon)Link | |
| Exactly, i was just thinkin' that, it reminds me of Heroes, what a shame! a better Heroes of course because I can't really say Angel is Heroes-y, eh! However, it goes everywhere, and mostly nowhere, with this arc but i can't neither say it's completely unuseful like almost all arcs in Heroes. Damn it! I wanted Angelus so bad! (not in THAT way!^^)and I got him. But "it was wrong"! nonetheless, some things were pretty cool like the Faith arc. So, that's actually the first review I read for Angel, and I guess I have to read them all now since they are this good! And, like I say in the Buffy reviews, sorry for my french accent (that means all the grammar errors!) |
| 7. | RickMay 25, 2009 (Mon)Link | |
| Je t'excuserai si tu excuse ma grammaire francaise! Je voudrais apprendre le francais completement, mais c'est une objective difficile dans une ville anglaise! Ou habites-tu, DarthMarion? Le Quebec? |
| 8. | DarthMarionMay 26, 2009 (Tue)Link | |
| Génial! du français! I live in the dear and old France! So learning english isn't that easy! However I guess it's easier in my case, with all the tv shows in original version (I'm convinced Buffy teached me 50% of my english! ...yeah, that's an excuse to see the episodes again and again, and an excuse I use for my parents to make my sister watch them again and again)and all the american influence! |
| 9. | Ryan-R.B.May 26, 2009 (Tue)Link | |
| @buffyholic Thanks for the warm welcome. @Arouet I don't think you're wrong in saying that this review comes off as less optimistic than my first go-round. The difference is in how I approach the story. Rather than take sides and make big, sweeping comments about how Angel is Just and Connor is Evil and Wesley is a Moral Backslider (which sounds vaguely kinky when you word it that way, actually), I decided to start backing off and simply account for what is. What the episode is itself. Punch me in my pretentious existentialism if you will. I’ll still review! ;)Arouet |
| 10. | ArouetJun 7, 2009 (Sun)Link | |
| Well there's a season to be subtle and let the plot cover the ideas of the story with a bedsheet and then there's a season to be open and aggressive and passionate, and one of the reasons I loved this show so much was that it knew when to stop being subtle and gentle and just let us listen to Angel trying to struggle with the meaning of his experiences. Reprise and Epiphany made nothing BUT big sweeping statements about humanity and evil and goodness, and those two and Deep Down are IMO, the best three episodes of the entire series(cept maybe Lullaby, Darla, and The Prodigal). Sometimes it takes more courage to come out and let the characters speak when you're afraid of sounding preachy than it is to restrain yourself when you want to preach. Even if they let the characters be themselves, you can't deny that the writers were obviously using them to illustrate specific examples of different philosophies. Angel IS just. Connor IS being pragmatic to the point of having the same actions as an evil person. Wesley IS succumbing to the same logic that dominates Connor, that seeking real justice is the luxury of those who do not suffer. The fact that it is so openly a parable is precisely what makes it so great. |
| 11. | Ryan-R.B.Jun 12, 2009 (Fri)Link | |
| Don't make the mistake of interchanging presumption with passion, Arouet. The more viscerally thrilling review may indeed be perched upon a soapbox, instructing the masses in vague constructions about what justice "really is," but I'll bet you that's not the more truthful review. My goal here is simple: to draw out the meanings and ideas of the episode as I see them so that the reader gets the most out of what I found in that episode. Since this is pretty much an opinion column extraordinaire I can't really get away from opinion or claim zero bias, but I try to constrain my opinions to the construction of the episode as a piece of fiction. I have opinions about justice, but I'm not going to presume to tell anyone else what justice is for them. That's up to them. That's up to you. To you, Angel is Just. To someone else he is a bastard. To me, he is a character in this story. |
| 12. | ArouetJun 16, 2009 (Tue)Link | |
| My point was only that in this review you made this episode sound more subtle than it really was, and that its lack of subtlety was its strength. And you can say all you want that you placed your own opinions upon the interpretation of Deep Down, but even if that was true, then your opinions coincided so much with what the episode was trying to argue for that your "preaching" was indistinguishable from your dead-on analysis of the new morality of Angel that dominates this season, and to a lesser extent season 5. I promise you I would have enjoyed my first gothrough of Season 4 a lot less if I hadn't read your clarifying comment "To be good is to do the right thing in spite of what you want" that gave me the framework to understand what the writers were trying to do with the whole season. You were right the first time. And I'm not trying to take you down here! I never would have bought the first two seasons on DVD if I hadn't stumbled upon this site (I'd watched Buffy but never Angel before). I see this show primarily on an intellectual level, like you, and I agree with pretty much all of your opinions except your overall reviews of Season 3 (I tend to judge whole story arcs primarily by their best moments and not their filler) and S5 (a whoooooooole 'nother story). |
| 13. | EmilyJun 21, 2009 (Sun)Link | |
| Great review, Ryan! You've said in previous reviews that we don't see the real Cordelia again after "Tomorrow" [3x22]- but isn't the higher-being-Cordelia that we see at the end of this episode *actually* Cordelia? Oh, and just trying to tip the scales here- I *love* Connor! |
| 14. | Nathan.TaurusFeb 6, 2010 (Sat) @ 6:25pmLink | |
| "I'll take away your bucket." I had to smile at this line.
I liked the family dynamic between Gunn, Fred and Connor in this episode. The way he still feels good when being told what to do by Gunn as it's a family unit, until he does the teenager thing and talks back. The excited look on Connors face when he is given permission to go with Fred and Gunn to see the vampire. Just like a little kid. Really good start to the season...too bad it pretty much goes to hell after a bit. |
| 15. | Nathan.TaurusFeb 6, 2010 (Sat) @ 6:36pmLink | |
| And, forgot about Gunn trying to tell Fred that she can't say things like, "Word" and other words that are used mainly by black people. C'mon, it might sound funny but there are no off limit words for different races. |
| 16. | EnajMay 18, 2010 (Tue) @ 12:35amLink | |
| Actually, I think the distinction wasn't between "black" and "white" with regards to Fred not being able to say certain words. I think it was more between "ghetto" and "not ghetto." Words and phrases like "word" and "bro" aren't exactly *restricted* to those of the African-American persuasion. I've been around a lot of black people who were raised in the suburbs who sound *ridiculous* when they try to work the "street talk," and it's funny as hell. And I've been around a lot of white people who were raised in the "not so good" part of town who you'd probably mistake for black with your eyes closed. It was funny and weird to hear Fred try and say stuff like that not because she is white, but because she's a very sweet, somewhat sheltered, country girl. I do agree that there should be no "off-limit" words for different races, but I don't know if I like the assumption that that was the point of the joke, or the implication that only black people speak that way. Honestly, though, I kind of hate the way they treat the entire "street" section of Angel (ie; Gunn, his entire crew, and even most of the kids from that homeless shelter). They try to play up the ghetto angle entirely too much and it's a bit cringe-inducing, especially when most of the actors they use on the show to play these supposedly *tough* street kids (like J. August Richards) were raised in the suburbs and are pretty obviously not all that comfortable talking "ghetto." |
| - | Post a Comment |
|
Name
(NOTE: Before posting your opinion on this episode, please remember to read the review, be respectful of opposing opinions, and to competently use at least basic spelling and grammar. The administrator has the right to remove a comment at any time.) (*** copy your comment in case of failure!!! ***) Security Code |