Angel  > ReviewsArticlesFeaturesLinks
3x02: "That Vision Thing"
Review by Ryan Bovay (Ryan-R.B.)
Posted on March 6, 2007
Writer: Jeffrey Bell | Director: Bill Norton | Air Date: 10/01/2001

Quick Links
Spoiler Warning!
This is a retrospective review and may contain spoilers from anywhere in the series. Read at your own peril.

"That Vision Thing" is an episode with a good deal of emotional strength and a pretty competent plot that manages to impress a good deal more than the season opener "Heartthrob" [3x01]. It also manages to accomplish the same ends in a thematic sense. Although, due to the necessity of dealing with the Buffy issue, it couldn't possibly have been the season opener. Unlike the last episode, it's an installment that has some good material that, while not necessarily in reach of a high point, has no real flaws and is a solid, standalone piece of work. Cordelia's visions have always been central to Angel's mission as has her bond with him, and the idea of toying with that made for a worthwhile showing.

The trouble starts right away. Cordelia's visions have been getting worse for a long time now, both in their emotional and physiological impact. In "Birthday" [3x11] we find out that she'd been popping serious painkillers to deal with them since around the time of "Redefinition" [2x11]. Then the damage took a huge step up in "Dead End" [2x18] when we saw how they were starting to cause serious and lasting pain in both of those ways, in which the feelings of the suffering in the visions stayed with her for unbearable minutes afterward. In S2 Cordy finally accepted the worth of these visions, even if she still bemoaned the pain that came with them.

Where once she made out with a demon to try and get rid of them ("Parting Gifts" [1x10]), she's now desperate not to lose them. Seeing what was over the rainbow for her in a prospective acting career and getting to literally be a princess in Pylea ("Belonging" [2x19] and "Through the Looking Glass" [2x21] respectively) exposed the shallowness of such pursuits for this emotionally mature woman, who saw the value of being recognized more for accomplishment and making that accomplishment something worthwhile. Now, even in spite of the increasingly horrid pain, she can't separate her identity from the visions. It allows her to be accomplished, to be important, but to be that way in a worthwhile and immaterial way; a direct contrast to her character two seasons ago.

Again the plot asks us to take a look at the theme of responsibility, but in a different way this time. We're asked exactly what directly or indirectly constitutes it. Is Angel the most responsible party, having killed do-gooders and freed an evil man? Is Cordy, whose life motivates the actions, or Lilah, who orchestrates it all? Is it all of them? The film Minority Report touches on something that I was reminded of in considering Lilah's manipulations. It featured a world where murder was non-existent because of a 'pre-crime' police unit that arrested murderers before they killed. The characters justify this system by arguing a form of determinism: Just because it was stopped doesn't mean it wasn't going to happen.

If we can't do anything other than what we would choose to do when confronted with a situation because of what informs our personalities, then all that is required to master human destiny and, in a sense, play God, is an understanding and apt manipulation of the people you require moved into place. This validates the claim that everything is pre-determined; not necessarily because of a higher power, but because of prior causal forces that make it impossible for us to do anything else than what we do when confronted with a choice. It means we really have no choice, only the illusion of it. It means Lilah's the one responsible. But Angel certainly doesn't believe in a pre-determined world, and neither does the show.

As outlined in "Epiphany" [2x16], he believes that actions are what define us. This is held true in determinism as well, but in a different way. Angel, however, is most definitely an indeterminist; choices made are actualizations amongst a sea of other possibilities. The truth is that Angel did kill those on the side of good and did free an evil man. And he believes that he's responsible, in some part, for making the choice to do so even if he didn't come to the moment of choice voluntarily. Lilah's definitely responsible as well, but not solely. As he so astutely observes, it was the wrong choice to make, but for good enough reasons, for which he'll eventually have to pay the consequences.

Cordelia's visions are important to his mission and having them compromised or the infallibility of them challenged threatens him and many others, as this episode demonstrated. That's not something he can tolerate and is most definitely something he will take dark measures in order to protect. But what's even more is that Cordelia and Angel share a special bond, one that we see starts turning into something even deeper this episode (to become love later this season). Cordelia was his first real link to humanity when he came to L.A. in "City of" [1x01], and she's the very first life and soul he ever saved. She's believed in him more than anyone and been a closer friend and confidant, even in the worst of times.

His devotion to her here, with all this strong past behind it, is completely genuine in its strength and all of the things Angel does to save her feel completely in character because of the bond we understand between them, becoming only stronger now. This is good character work, earned with years of careful plotting and foresight on behalf of the writers. The episode balances this type of development well with its moral considerations a la S2's and S5's better standalones. Along with some fairly good dialogue and a few genuinely funny moments, it strikes a very likeable chord even in between the drama and the pain that is watching Cordy suffer. One simply has to adore Skip, who's just too cool a guy.

It's also a good first entry into the Whedonverse for writer Jeffrey Bell, who'd go on to become a Co-Executive producer and actually does a lot of the showrunning for Joss Whedon in S4 (who at the time was doing also Buffy and Firefly). Although, one can note that the dialogue in this and some of Bell's other early episodes ("Quickening" [3x08]) does feel a little forced. But it's a problem that gets fixed pretty quickly. And it certainly doesn't hinder him here. Considering the importance of Cordelia's ascension to hero and her relationship with Angel later on in the season, this episode was a necessary first step and I quite enjoyed how it was handled.

Minor Pros/Cons (+/-)
+Fred being jittery again. I particularly empathize with her love of peanut butter right out of the jar.
+Gavin Park's anti-Angel tactics. It's the little things in life that really piss us off, no?
+The strengthening bond between Angel and Cordy. This is still my favourite dynamic on the show.
+Skip, the most truly frightening looking demon we've ever seen on this show, being as cool and friendly a guy as a Wal-Mart stock monkey.
  • The direct theme of direct and indirect responsibility here comes up again in "Billy" [3x06] in which Angel and Cordy track the man they freed here.
  • Cordelia views the visions as an integral part of her now. Later in the season this becomes literally true as she's made half-demon so as to better use them ("Birthday" [3x11]) and eventually transcends to become a higher being that's, in a way, becoming them ("Tomorrow" [3x22]).




GUNN:Ah, I-I don't mean to rush you back into the twenty first century, but how about using some chopsticks. Or a fork, maybe. (Picks up a fork and offers it to her) You remember forks, don't you?
FRED:Sure. Who could forget? Fork, pitch fork, fork it over, fork in the road - one I'm not ready to take yet.

ANGEL:Fred! Good to see you out and about.
FRED:It is, isn't it? Out and about. (Leans towards Angel) I've been forking with Gunn.

CORDELIA:Sure I hate looking and feeling like this, but - if I lose the visions, I wouldn't be able to help you anymore. You wouldn't need me.
ANGEL:That's not why I need you. You're important. - And the visions are just after market extras like Hurst shift or Krager wheels.
CORDELIA:Did you just compare me to a car?
ANGEL:It was a very nice car.
CORDELIA:I guess that's better than a dog.

CORDELIA:I like the mountains.
LORNE:Beautiful. Say you're on a mountaintop, and it's warm. The sky is blue, full of big, fluffy clouds. You're Julie Andrews in 'The Sound of Music.' And you're relaxed and you're spinning and the camera is swirling and - ouch! (Lorne recoils from Cordy) Careful, honey, you've got some power of your own!
CORDELIA:Sorry. All the spinning and swirling was freaking me out.
LORNE:My fault, my fault. I just love that movie so much!

ANGEL:Oh. So the Chinese guy and the boil guy...
WESLEY:Were also aligned with the forces of good.
ANGEL:Damn! So hard to tell these days. You know, they should wear lapel pins or something.

ANGEL:So, ah, you live in here, Skip?
SKIP:No. I commute. It's not too bad - about twenty minutes.
ANGEL:(about the prisoner) Uh, what keeps him in the fire?
SKIP:My will.
ANGEL:How come he's not screaming in pain?
SKIP:Oh, he is. My will prevents him from being heard. I mean there is only so many 'oh my god! The pain! Please make it stop!' that you can listen to before it starts to bug the crap out of you.
ANGEL:I see your point.

Comments (14)
All Comments | Link1 | buffyholicMar 4, 2008
Great review, Ryan. I agree with you when you say that this is a great standalone. It has a great plot, wonderful characterization and great writing.
All Comments | Link2 | EmilyJun 3, 2009
I kinda wish they had never made the Angel/Cordy couple- it would've been nice not to have everyone falling in love with each other: Cordy and Wes (on Buffy), Fred and Gunn, Fred and Wes, and Angel and Cordy. Come on!! It would've been nice for them to continue the really close, but platonic, relationship they had. Kinda like in "Bones." Well, except that Booth is in love with Brennan. Fine then- like in "Bones," but only in theory.
All Comments | Link3 | Nathan.TaurusJan 30, 2010 @ 7:50pm
While watching the series again I took more interest in the Skip vs Angel fight to see if I could see anything that would confirm what Skip tells him in Season 4.
Angel does knock him out fairly easy.

So many idle, pointless threats to Lilah about killing her and what does he do?

Great episode for Cordelia, especially with the husky voice when she has the boils and burns.

Fred: I've never understood that saying, 'Right as Rain'. How is rain right, or, or wrong for that matter? Okay, I suppose if there's a flood it's wrong, a-and speaking of floods, or maybe just being overwhelmed, what's it like to have a vision?
Cordelai: Wow! You know, next to you I'm downright linear.
All Comments | Link4 | JammyJuMar 20, 2010 @ 9:45pm
Watched this for the second time today.

Really enjoyed it alot more, probably down to knowing what lies ahead; but a great start none-the-less.

Angel killing that guy from Harold and Kumar at the end was fantastic, and showed what a real threat he is.

And Cordelia's injuries projected real tension for her safety, and what the future holds for her visions.
All Comments | Link5 | ElizabethAug 29, 2010 @ 1:57am
I am so sad that no one has mentioned Dennis!! It's amazing how attached I feel to something that is invisible. But he is just so sweet and you can tell how much he loves Cordy. Also, I find him to be a hilarious character.
All Comments | Link6 | OliverAug 4, 2012 @ 1:22pm
It should be "try to," not "try and." Would you attempt and do something?
All Comments | Link7 | Geki Mar 12, 2013 @ 6:47am
Replying to Oliver (#6)
Hey Oliver:

"Usage note
10. 'Try' followed by 'and' instead of 'to' has been in standard use since the 17th century: "The Justice Department has decided to try and regulate jury-selection practices." The construction occurs only with the base form 'try', not with 'tries' or 'tried' or 'trying'."

If you're going to be a pedantic grammar-twat, at least try to be a correct pedantic grammar-twat.
All Comments | Link8 | Jeremy G. | WRITERMar 12, 2013 @ 7:12am
Replying to Oliver (#6)
Good try, Oliver. But you should leave the pedantic grammar-checking to Brian.
All Comments | Link9 | disaronnusMar 15, 2013 @ 7:36am
Please, can we not call people "twats"?
That's definitely not something I like to see on this site, which is such a courteous and welcoming community (not easy to find on the internet).

Thank you.
All Comments | Link10 | AlexMar 15, 2013 @ 10:23am
Replying to disaronnus (#9)
I agree it's not nice to call people names. However, in the UK that word is generally considered far, far milder than it is in the US. In the UK it's not much more offensive than calling someone a jerk or a moron. So it's not nice, but it doesn't exactly make old ladies faint and fall off their chairs when you use it either.

I lived in the US for a while and soon realised that it was a much bigger deal over there. Also, they pronounce it weirdly - for ages I was wondering what on earth a 'twod' was. Anyway...

Of course, I don't know where you or Geki are from, but I just thought I'd mention that in case it wasn't quite meant as offensively as you thought. But regardless, let's try not to call each other names anyway :-)
All Comments | Link11 | disaronnusMar 18, 2013 @ 12:41pm
Replying to Alex (#10)
Alex, thanks for your post. It's not the word itself but the spirit behind it that I was calling out. It's so rare to see people attacking each other here, no matter how mildly. Didn't leave me with a good feeling. As offenses go...pedantic grammar-checking doesn't make it high on my list, so I was surprised to see such a heated response (as best one can read tone in writing of course). It bothered me, so I decided to say something.
All Comments | Link12 | Jeremy G. | WRITERMar 18, 2013 @ 2:23pm
It's kind of difficult to place emotion in writing, so you can't be faulted for taking offense. Personally, I thought the comment wasn't meant to be extra-mean or anything.

Incidentally, I live in the US and always thought that "twat" was a very mild word. I mean, I've never heard anyone being called out for using the word. Come to think of it, I've never heard anyone in this country use that word at all.
All Comments | Link13 | ArachneaApr 7, 2013 @ 11:28pm
I tend to disagree with Cordelia, what Angel and Wesley agreed to do in order to save her was selfish, though in a good kind of way. It reminded me of the episode in BtVS when Wesley was ready to sacrifice Willow for the greater good, but not the Scoobies. What I liked is that here - unlike the Scoobies - they acknowledged that what they're doing isn't right.
All Comments | Link14 | WvethJul 3, 2013 @ 10:34am
Replying to Geki (#7)
It's common usage to say "try and" but it's still wrong. Just saying.

Great review!
Post a Comment
Allowed tags: [i], [b], [u], [quote], [link=]
Reply To
NOTE: Before commenting please read the review, argue/augment the points made in it, and be respectful of opposing opinions.
*** COPY YOUR COMMENT (in case of posting failure)! ***

Security Code
Security Code


Copyright © 2005-2017 Critically Touched. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any review or article on this site is prohibited. For questions regarding specific content, please click on the author's name to find their contact information. You can contact the site creator, Mikelangelo Marinaro, at: mikejer[at]criticallytouched[dot]com. All works and related characters are property of the production companies associated with the content. Critically Touched has no affiliation with with any of these companies.