STYLES: STANDARD  |  PRINT NAVIGATE: CRITICALLYTOUCHED.COM Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Get the news with RSS!
Ryan's Angel Reviews
homereviewsarticleslinksdiscussion
<<Expecting
I've Got You Under My Skin>>

SHE (1x13)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Season 1 Review>>
A review by Ryan Bovay,
May 8, 2006

Writer: David Greenwalt and Marti Noxon
Director: David Greenwalt

- Quick Links


WARNING: This is a retrospective review and may contain SPOILERS. Read at your own discretion.

- Review

Shockingly, this episode was written by series co-creater David Greenwalt, and right-hand-to-Joss-herself Marti Noxon. This shocks me because “She” has problems that writers of their caliber, especially on this show, don’t often cause. The episode itself is an anomaly; an intriguing mix of mysticism, social commentary and could actually have really been a highlight with some better execution implemented. As it stands, it’s probably the poorest episode of the entire season, and likely one of the lesser showings of the series as well. This is a particular disappointment, as the first half of the season has been mostly consistent in its high quality.

The plot’s conception isn’t all that bad either; the main faults lie in the execution. The basic synopsis is one we’ve seen in many sci fi and fantasy shows: A dimensional portal opens up, and trouble comes through. In this case it is in the form Jhiera, a warrior princess from an alternate dimension to ours, on her mission to liberate the women of her home. She and her species, of the dimension of Oden Tal, are all extremely close to human, save for the males who posses ridges on their foreheads, and the females who possess what looks like a skin-covered spine on their back, jutting out from where their spine lays (this extra ‘spine’ being called a ‘Ko’).

We learn that Jhiera is the princess of her dimension, a dimension where all females have their Ko’s forcibly removed to prevent them from involuntarily seducing men, as the Ko generates energy that drives males into lust beyond reason. The only problem being that the removal also strips them of their sexuality and much of their emotional range, making them near androgynous. The men claim necessity on the grounds of maintaining the order of society, the women claim oppression, and we, the audience, claim disinterest. I’d wager that even the synopsis bored you.

As I said, it’s not all that bad an idea, but falls completely apart on the screen. It’s another shocker that David Greenwalt also directed this; he’s usually better. Firstly, the pace is impossibly slow. We don’t even see Jheira until about a quarter of the way through the episode, and are instead given a bunch of pointless misdirection about who killed a few men in a warehouse. The story elements, concerning Jheira’s people, are not even brought in until three quarters of the way through the episode, and even then it’s only given to us to provide context for the battle in the final act, and to give us the full point about the episode’s metaphor. However, this too is done poorly and isn’t all that satisfying; the whole fight scene is anti-climactic.

Then there’s other material that’s just a waste. Angel trying to dial his Investigation’s office number on the crummy cell phone was kind of funny, but took too long. Also, him following Jhiera shouldn’t have taken as long as it did either. And while I enjoyed him pretending to be an art exhibitor, and hinting that Baudelaire’s “Le Vampyr” was influenced by his evil alter-ego Angelus, this was just more filler. It also kind of lends more credit to critics of this show who call it a rip-off of “Forever Knight” (as a popular shtick was to see how Knight was conveniently connected to important historical moments). ‘Knight’ was an older TV show with Anne Rice-style vampire mythology that, too, is about a formerly evil blood-sucker seeking redemption.

But, as long as we’re on the plot, I’ll concede that I did enjoy the teaser scene. Wesley trying to hit on women was absolutely priceless, and Angel’s fantasy of himself trying to dance was downright classic. It’s small, but also provides a decent commentary about Angel’s image. When Cordelia chastises him for ‘sucking the energy’ out of the party, he defends himself and his cool, lurking-in-the-shadows image. Turns out – surprise! – that image doesn’t really impress most people, and Angel’s insecurity about himself and interacting with others is a nice insight; dark, lurky guy may not be so solid and collected after all.

My next major problem with this episode lies within the metaphor. Now, obviously, the entire thing is a metaphor for the barbaric practice of forced female circumcision. This is a practice that still takes place in some very dogmatic countries and other isolated tribes today. The Ko represents the female clitoris, and the mystical effect it has, driving men around the Oden Tal women into involuntary lust, represents the sexual power it can have over men. It’s never so blatant in our world, but the male impulses and drives to attain sex, especially for younger males, is strong.

The Vigories (male denizens of Oden Tal) are representations of the extremist religious and cultural views; societies that see female sexuality as a devil’s tool or a threat, as the power of sexuality over men is massive (you ever seen an ad campaign?). The removal of the Ko and its effects are where the metaphor speaks its piece. A female from Oden Tal who is captured from Jhiera’s rescue attempt is stripped of her Ko in a rather disturbing scene that was played out like a brutal rape; I suppose we’re meant to believe it was. When the Ko is removed, she appears to become an empty, obedient slave to the Vigories’ will.

Like the episode as a whole, I just didn’t appreciate how this concept was carried out. We’re kind of hit over the head with it, rather repeatedly. In particular, all the discussion about males forcing the de-Ko’d women to “do as they wish, marry as they wish” crossed the line into “duh” territory. The males are also portrayed as dumb, mindless evil. That may even be, but their motives are still a little hazy; it was hinted that the Ko’s power was so strong that it actually caused society-wide chaos, and I would’ve loved to have heard more about this kind of thing. Putting the entire conflict into a total gray area, one where the innate nature of the female may actually be truly dangerous would’ve been the perfect route for this show.

It would have also added another dimension to Jhiera’s character; she is a woman driven by her kind’s plight, and clearly feels no remorse for the death of men who come between her people’s salvation, even innocent human men in our dimension. To have her entire quest rendered purely self-serving and ignorant of the greater good in light of truth would’ve fashioned very interesting material, discussion, and fit with her character (she’s remorseless over the human men, and has not a quandary about sacrificing Angel’s friends for her girls, despite their equal innocence). Instead, we get scenes with her flexing her cleavage and making Angel hot and bothered. Yawn. The talented Bai Ling does her best with this role, and is the only saving grace; the poor pacing and sloppy writing allows the character one dimension only.

Take the what the metaphor says as you may; clearly feminist, it’s still not wrong about the horrors inflicted upon certain women in the world, and how it can rob a woman of her dignity and, akin to a rape, can make her feel violated, dominated, and powerless. And Angel, counter pointed by the Vigories, provided an interesting specimen to study. He was, in Jhiera’s presence, seduced, but controlled his urges. The Vigories, clearly incapable of doing any such thing, reacted with fear and hatred for the Ko and the Oden Tal women, eventually descending into violence. It’s my favourite aspect of the metaphor, and makes an interesting point about the responsibility of men to control their urges, and how they make their own fear of female sexuality through their lack of control.

Agree or disagree with the point made, these parts worked. Overall, it’s just too heavy-handed for my liking. The males coldly and lamely referring to any woman as “it,” the talk about forced marriage, and how the women instantly turn into mindless drones without their Ko’s, well, it was all just too obvious to be appreciated.

Add to the fact that we’re given little back story on Oden Tal and it’s people, that what we are given is given to us very late in the game, and that absolutely no consequences come of any events in this episode, we’re left with a useless pile of ‘what-could’ve-been.’ Angel and Jhiera clash over the human men’s death, Angel scares off the Vigories and the women flee. I was almost frustrated watching, seeing Greenwalt and Noxon miss every mark they aimed for.

I did read that Jheira was to be a recurring character, and so maybe more of her story was meant to be told. Too bad it never was, as it could’ve redeemed this poor showing in some aspects, most preferably its stunning uselessness.



- Minor Pros/Cons (+/-)
Pros:
+  
Angel’s fantasy of himself dancing.
+  
Angel’s comments on Baudelaire; entertaining, if useless.
+  
Wesley kicking ass.
+  
Cordelia sneering at Jhiera.
  
Cons:
-  
Bumbling Wesley. It was way too overdone.
-  
The mansion. I find it hard to believe no one’s noticed the presence of so many strange women, or the huge quantity of ice being delivered there.


- Quotes
WESLEY:  
(to Angel; cocky) What say a couple of brooding demon hunters start chatting up some of the fillies?
GIRL:  
Hey. (Wesley chokes on his food and starts coughing) Nice sweater. Hand knit?
WESLEY:  
Certainly not by me.
GIRL:  
I didn’t mean – I mean it’s a great sweater.
WESLEY:  
Oh, well, I-I’ll pass that on then – to the person who knit it – I-I mean, I would, if I knew who did – but I don’t - So I won’t pass it on to anyone, will I?

CORDELIA:  
(answers the phone) Angel Investigations. We help the hopeless.
ANGEL:  
I hate the cell phone that you gave me. Any luck?
CORDELIA:  
We’re stymied on the demon guy, *but* we did find four similar killings in the last 11 months. All guys, all burned from the inside out. (about the demon) Did you find it?
ANGEL:  
Yeah. It’s not an ‘it,’ it’s a ‘she.

ANGEL:  
(pretends to be showing at the gallery) On the left one spies the painter himself. In the middle distance is the French poet and critic Baudelaire, a friend of the artist. Now, Baudelaire – interesting fellow. In his poem ‘Le Vampyr’ he wrote

JHIERA:  
When the females come of age, Ko controls our physical and sexual power – It even signals when we are aroused and have met desirable mates. But when it’s removed…
ANGEL:  
You’re more easily controlled.
JHIERA:  
We marry who they command, - serve without questioning - We leave behind dreaming.

GUY:  
My shaman has a place in the dessert. He never could turn away scantily clad women in distress - from any dimension. (pauses) You know, I wish you would let me work on your mirth chakra.
JHIERA:  
If he’s as trustworthy as you are, we’ll go to him.
GUY:  
He’s good people.

JHIERA:  
I had no choice.
ANGEL:  
Yes, you did. If you vowed to protect the innocent it shouldn’t matter which dimension they’re from.
JHIERA:  
An easy sentiment when your people are free.
ANGEL:  
I’m not saying you shouldn’t fight. Just know that I will be there to stop you – if you cross the line.
JHIERA:  
I don’t need an extra conscience. I’ll do what I think is right.
ANGEL:  
And I’ll do the same.


- Score Learn about the Grading Scale
50/100 D
Silly, useless plot. Poor execution of intended (if any) themes. No new important character development or insight. Offers no reason to bother rewatching it.


- Screencaps
<<Expecting
I've Got You Under My Skin>>

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Season 1 Review>>

- Comments (24) View Today's Comments | Subscribe:

1.fryrishMay 9, 2006 (Tue)View This Person's Comments | Link
This is an episode I love in spite of the main point. I don't dislike it all that much really, but its stuff Marti Noxon had already covered better in her Buffy eps to that point. There's some really great character interaction between Angel, Cordelia and Wesley that makes up for its flaws though. I love the party and the Angel dancing. One of my favourite quotes being:

CORDELIA: This is your idea of hell, isn't it?
ANGEL: Actually, in hell you tend to know a lot of the people.

I love scene in the office with Angel offering Wesley a job. I love the final scene with the coffee bean spillage. Bumbling Wesley as a negative. :P I found him coming onto all of the women during the rescue hilarious. This stuff, and the stuff you mentioned in the review, raise my opinion of an otherwise lackluster episode.

I've only seen a few episodes of Forever Knight so I'm not sure what you mean in regard to the criticisms. Care to elaborate?

Looking forward to your next review. It's one of my favourite episodes of Angel.

2.TranquillityMar 6, 2007 (Tue)View This Person's Comments | Link
Without doubt the worst episode of Angel ever, and perhaps the worst chapter of the entire whendonverse.

3.TranquillityMar 6, 2007 (Tue)View This Person's Comments | Link
oh, i just went back and read the review and saw that cordelia's party was in this ep. That was funny and the only bit of the show worth watching.

4.MikeJerMar 6, 2007 (Tue)View This Person's Comments | Link
Just for the record, this episode would have gotten an easy F from me. :p

5.shanshuprophecyJun 21, 2007 (Thu)View This Person's Comments | Link
Agree with most of your points here.
In fact I am currently doing my 5th watching of the Angel DVD's & this is one of the eps that I ff after the scene with Angel Dancing - which I loved the first 2 times but after watching all of the behind the scenes interviews/outtakes etc.. I am less of a DB fan than I used to be .. I love Angel .. not so fond of DB himself & the dancing smacks of DB NOT Angel .. my opinion only :))

6.shanshuprophecyJun 21, 2007 (Thu)View This Person's Comments | Link
Agree with most of your points here.
In fact I am currently doing my 5th watching of the Angel DVD's & this is one of the eps that I ff after the scene with Angel Dancing - which I loved the first 2 times but after watching all of the behind the scenes interviews/outtakes etc.. I am less of a DB fan than I used to be .. I love Angel .. not so fond of DB himself & the dancing smacks of DB NOT Angel .. my opinion only :))

7.shanshuprophecyJun 21, 2007 (Thu)View This Person's Comments | Link
OOPPPSSSS!!!

Sorry about the double - I got an error message the first time around & thought it didn't work ...

8.AaronJerAug 23, 2007 (Thu)View This Person's Comments | Link
I agree with MJ. This is easily the worst episode of BtVS of AtS and by a wide margin. The bad episodes of BtVS were at least fun to laugh at and pick apart. This episode just makes me want to die. It is the only episode of either series that I wish I had never seen and would certainly never rewatch. This episode was hideously and unbearably boring. I felt like I was watching Xena without any comedy. It was a stupid and cliché storyline without the slightest bit of innovation. I'd be impressed with how "by the books" they managed to make the episode if I wasn't so busy cutting myself.

9.AaronJerAug 23, 2007 (Thu)View This Person's Comments | Link
I agree with MJ. This is easily the worst episode of BtVS of AtS and by a wide margin. The bad episodes of BtVS were at least fun to laugh at and pick apart. This episode just makes me want to die. It is the only episode of either series that I wish I had never seen and would certainly never rewatch. This episode was hideously and unbearably boring. I felt like I was watching Xena without any comedy. It was a stupid and cliché storyline without the slightest bit of innovation. I'd be impressed with how "by the books" they managed to make the episode if I wasn't so busy cutting myself.

10.AaronJerAug 23, 2007 (Thu)View This Person's Comments | Link
Why that posted twice, I don't know. This comment system is tarded.

11.buffyholicFeb 3, 2008 (Sun)View This Person's Comments | Link
Ryan, I´m surprised you gave this episode a 50. This has to be the worst episode of the whedonverse. The only thing I like about this is the first scene where Angel fantasies about him dancing.

12.Till EulenspiegelMar 26, 2009 (Thu)View This Person's Comments | Link
It is a very boring episode (with a few good moments), but the worst? Please. Aren't we forgetting, well, pretty much everything to do with Connor? Boring is better than extremely annoying.

13.EmilyMay 9, 2009 (Sat)View This Person's Comments | Link
I have to say this *was* the worst episode so far. I have seen the whole Angel series already, but I don't remember if it's the worst episode over all.

Was Angel saying that *he* was Baudelaire? Confused at that point. Because Angel only got his soul in 1898- I think- and Angelus didn't write poetry.

14.wytchcroftAug 2, 2009 (Sun)View This Person's Comments | Link
i like this episode a lot more than Expecting which REALLY has metaphor, pacing and tone problems.

Apart from the nifty teaser scene there's also the real beginning of team Angel v2.0 as Wesley gets a salary, and that scene is another winner.

I don't think the pace is as slow as you do, and some of the initial mystery is well done.

I have no real love for the story as a whole but i don't hate it like most folks seem to. On the other hand, most of the narrative flaws and hackle raising lack of the subtle you point out are - well, you're not wrong.

15.GuidoJan 30, 2010 (Sat) @ 12:44pmView This Person's Comments | Link
I would give this episode a 75, at least. It took a courageous stance against the primitive, misogynistic, sheep-herder mentality of the Islamic world. Forced circumcision is a heinous and barbaric act, perpetrated by a male-dominated culture that relies on the centuries-old words of a pedophile warlord for its spiritual guidance.

In western society, the United States especially, the laudable notion of religious tolerance is taken to such an extreme that we ignore the evils of Islam in the interest of cultural sensitivity. We rightfully shout in anger over the indignities of slavery and genocide, we get our panties in a knot when an "official" enemy such as Iraq invades Kuwait, and we send men and women to die for it, but when 50% of an entire culture is oppressed, sexually mutilated, forced to marry before they are even teenagers, sentenced to 100 lashes or stoning to death for extramarital sex, even when raped in some cases, and generally stripped of their rights, we turn a blind eye. Or, we turn to the molasses-slow and feckless system of diplomacy when only the most publicized and cruel instances of the abuse of women come to light.

We tread ever so cautiously and carefully in our righteous indignation so as not to offend the religion of Islam, ignoring the fact that it shares most of the guilt, and perpetuates the ignorance that leads to these crimes. That makes us complicit in the torment of women. Hard to hear for some, and I'm sorry to get so political, but it is by way of saying that David Greenwalt and Marti Noxon took a bold and politically incorrect stance in writing this episode. Treated as anything but metaphor, this episode would likely have never been aired, or watered down beyond recognition.

The metaphor may have been simple and exaggerated, and the execution awkward, but it was not without significance. We don't see stuff like this very often, and isn't that one of the things we appreciate about the Whedonverse?

16.CirrusFeb 27, 2010 (Sat) @ 1:58pmView This Person's Comments | Link
I... actually liked this episode. Then again, I saw all the scores for bad episodes in the Buffy section before I watched them, so I always expected something awful -- usually they just turned out mediocre because of that expectation.

But even so... I actually prefer this over I've Got You Under My Skin, which I'm amazed you gave an A-. I think this episode had a lot to like about it. I agree that it would have been nice to see Jhiera's lack of remorse explored more deeply, and I really disliked the whole Angel/Jhiera-ish aspect. Priority should have been making Jhiera an actual character.

Even so, definitely not the worse episode of Season 1 -- there were a couple of worse nearer the beginning, and at least this one was memorable. I always seem to disagree with you guys when you rate episodes D and below, though. X3

17.AttackedWithHummusApr 18, 2010 (Sun) @ 11:12amView This Person's Comments | Link
This episode is just plain awful I can't even fathom how all the talent was sucked out of these usually fantastic filmmakers, but I can't go into it without falling asleep.

I only want to point out that the man who ran the mansion was Sean Gunn who also played Lucas in "Hero." Perhaps they thought we wouldn't recognize him without Brachen makeup despite the bone structure, build, and exceedingly trademark voice? Anyway, I could never take him seriously in any role after seeing him as Kirk in "Gilmore Girls" (which - I know - came mostly after, but still).

18.MaxApr 23, 2010 (Fri) @ 3:11pmView This Person's Comments | Link
Guido, you need to learn the difference between Islam and certain Arab societies before you take your righteous stance.

You're a lot more ignorant than you seem to think.

19.GuidoApr 24, 2010 (Sat) @ 12:25amView This Person's Comments | Link
Max, I don't know why, to you, I seem to think I'm ignorant. Sorry, couldn't help being a pedant.

It seems you did not read my post carefully. I acknowledged that part of the problem of forced female circumcision is societal, not necessarily having it's origins in religion. However, Islam serves to perpetuate ancient tribal customs that, to western societies, appear cruel, unnecessary, and based on superstitious beliefs. There is no denying that Islam, a religion that basically has locked itself and its adherents into the 12th Century, does little to stop, and indeed decrees, the oppression of women.

That said, my point was that the show's writers are to be commended for addressing this subject.

20.MaxApr 25, 2010 (Sun) @ 4:01amView This Person's Comments | Link
Guido, female circumcision preceded both Christianity and Islam. In fact, Islam states that the practice is "haram and barbaric" and thus should not be practiced. So, I don't understand why you feel it necessary to attack one particular religion.

Also "There is no denying that Islam, a religion that basically has locked itself and its adherents into the 12th Century, does little to stop, and indeed decrees, the oppression of women". Why? Why is there no denying? You can't just base your opinions of an entire religion on what you see in the media, or presented by fanatics. You just seem to buy in to mass hysteria of something you do not understand. In it's truest form, it is a religion that preaches peace and equality. In more tolerant Islamic societies (Bangladesh to name one) women are far from oppresed. It is not the religion, but those with foolish agendas that have misrepresented the religion to justify their motives. Where I live, in the UK, there are numerous right wing, fascist groups such as the BNP, who misquote the holy texts to spread religious hatred and to inside both sides.

Islam only "appears cruel to western societies" that do not bother to find out the truth about reality, rather than believe anything that they are told.

NOTE: I would like to just point out that I don't mean to personally attack you, and am not trying to label you as "fascist, right-wing" e.t.c.

21.GuidoApr 25, 2010 (Sun) @ 11:27amView This Person's Comments | Link
Max, I don't wish to continue this, as it is derailing the purpose of this comment section. I have to say, however, that your have been unfair, and somewhat condescending. You have erected assumptions about me that are uncalled for.

Yes, I know "female circumcision preceded both Christianity and Islam." Why would you think I don't know this?

Correlation does not imply causation. My reference to the "Islamic world" may have led you to believe I blame Islam for female genital mutilation; I only blame it for its archaic doctrines that contribute to continual subservience of women, thereby reinforcing—particularly in sub-Saharan Africa—cruel and superstitious ancient practices.

If you are not trying to label me as "fascist, right-wing' e.t.c.," then please do not equate what I have said with what Nazi organizations like the BNP, or their followers, believe. In spite of your denial, you erected a straw man at my expense. And yes, I will concede that to "blame" Islam for female genital mutilation would be doing much the same thing, but as I said, I have not done this. The "Islamic world," as I put it, is itself a generalization (intended mainly to correspond to the predominantly Islamic Arab and sub-Saharan African regions), so I concede that, but again, there is a strong and academically supported nexus between the religion and the ignorance and superstition underlying the ill treatment of women and girls in this particular "world."

Yes, there are "more' tolerant Islamic societies," which implies (and indeed is true) that there are "less" tolerant ones. I am not talking about peaceful Muslims. Not all Christians kill doctors who perform abortions, either, but then does that make the subject of the religious influences on culture off limits?

You implied in several places, either directly or indirectly by association, that I am intellectually lazy: I "base [my] opinions" on those of others, I "buy in to mass hysteria of something [I] do not understand," I "do not bother to find out the truth," that I "believe anything that [I am] told." These are veiled ad hominem attacks, whether you "mean" them or not. This practice makes for tiresome debate, because—whether intentionally or not—it attempts to marginalize an opponent by characterizing them as ignorant and in need of a good education. I can't just sit by and let someone try to substitute their knowledge and wisdom for mine, based on almost no information as to my level of education, experience, insights or political affiliations.

As I said, I don't want to derail the discussion of this episode. If you wish to respond, I will regard your reply as the final word out of respect for the comment board. However, please do not continue to make assumptions about my intelligence, knowledge and motivations, or rely on information that I have not previously and explicitly given.

22.DavidMay 6, 2010 (Thu) @ 10:17amView This Person's Comments | Link
I would personally give it 70%, give or take. It includes good humour, some chemistry between Angel and the princess, interesting idea, tension caused by different viewpoints and the action; even if execution was far from perfect.

The 50% rating seems to be unfair in my opinion ... and for you guys shouting this was the worst episode from BtVS and AtS - please (re)watch some of the 1st BtVS eqpisodes and than come back and apologize yourself.

23.FloOct 18, 2010 (Mon) @ 9:04pmView This Person's Comments | Link
After reading on several occasions how aweful this episode supposedly is, I was surprised to find that I actually rather liked it.
Sure, it has its problems. The metaphor is overly explicit, but no more than that in several other Angel episodes (especially the Hero-Nazis), and at least here we get a hint at a grey area. In particularly I thought that the ambiguousness of the Jhiera character, a freedom-fighter who literally goes over corpses for her cause, worked quite well.
What I actually found most jarring was that Angel didn't really fit in the episode. In his first encounter with Jhiera he seemed very much out of his league, but he still somehow manages to chivalrously save her again and again. That really didn't fit; although I think there was on poccasion some nice sexual tension between the two (which Angel seemed to brush off way too easily imo, considering the difficulties he and Buffy always had keeping their hands off each other).
Come to think of it I recon it would have been fun to make Sean Gunn's character Jheira's love interest, and develop his character a bit instead of dumping him so unceremoniously.
But these problems I found no worse than those of some prior episodes which have gotten far better scores (Hero again being a prime example).

24.jojo nycFeb 16, 2011 (Wed) @ 10:52pmView This Person's Comments | Link
I like this episode a lot. I think the writers had fun and went for a different kind of pacing. Kind of a standalone episode and had a bit of a classic Star Trek feel to it.

Just watched it tonight as my wife and I discover the Angel series (after loving the whole Buffy arc). The only episode I didn't like so far is Bachelor Party (aside from Doyle himself in that episode).


- Post a Comment
Name

(NOTE: Before posting your opinion on this episode, please remember to read the review, be respectful of opposing opinions, and to competently use at least basic spelling and grammar. The administrator has the right to remove a comment at any time.)
(*** copy your comment in case of failure!!! ***)

Security Code
Security Code

  

Copyright © 2012 CriticallyTouched.com, Ryan Bovay (through 4x04) and various others (e-mail the site administrator at: mikejer[at]criticallytouched[dot]com). All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any review or article on this site is prohibited. All works and related characters are property of Joss Whedon, Mutant Enemy, 20th Century FOX, Universal Studios, Dark Horse Comics, and IDW Comics. I have no affiliation with Joss Whedon or any of those companies.